The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Utah Lists

Here is the text we could read:

I/We are  [  ]  Petitioner 
 

[  ]  Petitioner’s Attorney 
[  ]  Petitioner's  Licensed Paralegal Practitioner  
[  ]  Respondent's  Licensed Paralegal Practitioner  

[  ] Respondent 
[  ] Respondent's Attorney  (Utah Bar #:__________) 
(Utah Bar #:__________) 
(Utah Bar #:__________) 

In the District Court of Utah 

__________ Judicial District ________________ County 

Court Address ______________________________________________________ 

In re marriage of 

and  

____________________________________ 

____________________________________ 

Order on Petition to Recognize a 
Relationship as a Marriage 

_______________________________ 
Case Number 

_______________________________ 
Judge 

_______________________________ 
Commissioner 

The matter before the court is a Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage. 
This matter is being resolved by: 

[  ]  The default of     [  ] Petitioner     [  ] Respondent. 

[  ]  The stipulation of the parties. 

[  ]  The pleadings and other papers of the parties. 

[  ]  A hearing held on __________________________ (date), notice of which was 
served on all parties. 

Petitioner  

1602FAJ Approved October 19, 2020 
 

Order on Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage 

Page 1 of 4 

ity, State, Zip 

ame 

ddress 

hone 

mail 

  N

  A

  C

  P

  E

[  ] was represented by _________________________________________ (name). 

[  ] was present    [  ] was not present. 

[  ] was not represented. 

Respondent 

[  ] was present    [  ] was not present. 

[  ] was not represented. 

[  ] was represented by _________________________________________ (name). 

Other Interested Party _______________________________________ (name). 

[  ] was present    [  ] was not present. 

[  ] was represented by _________________________________________ (name). 

[  ] was not represented. 

Having considered the documents filed with the court, the evidence and the arguments, 
and now being fully informed, 

The court orders: 

The Petition is  [  ] granted    [  ] denied. 

[  ]  The partners shall be considered married as of __________________ (date). 

ommissioner's or Judge’s signature may instead appear at the top of the first page of this document. 

Signature ► 

Commissioner 

Signature ► 

Judge 

 

 

 

 

1. 

2. 

    C

 
Date 

 
Date 

 

1602FAJ Approved October 19, 2020 
 

Order on Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage 

Page 2 of 4 

Signature ► 

Petitioner, Attorney or Licensed Paralegal 
Practitioner 

Signature ► 

Respondent, Attorney or Licensed Paralegal 
Practitioner 

 

 

 

 

 
Date 

 
Date 

     

Approved as to form. 

1602FAJ Approved October 19, 2020 
 

Order on Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage 

Page 3 of 4 

 

 

 

 

 
Date 

 

I certify that I filed with the court and am serving a copy of this Order on Petition to Recognize a 
Relationship as a Marriage on the following people. 

Certificate of Service 

Person’s Name 

Service Method 

Service Address 

Service 
Date 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[  ]  Mail 
[  ]  Hand Delivery 
[  ]  E-filed 
[  ]  Email 
[  ]  Left at business (With person in charge 

or in receptacle for deliveries.) 

[  ]  Left at home (With person of suitable 

age and discretion residing there.) 

[  ]  Mail 
[  ]  Hand Delivery 
[  ]  E-filed 
[  ]  Email 
[  ]  Left at business (With person in charge 

or in receptacle for deliveries.) 

[  ]  Left at home (With person of suitable 

age and discretion residing there.) 

[  ]  Mail 
[  ]  Hand Delivery 
[  ]  E-filed 
[  ]  Email  
[  ]  Left at business (With person in charge 

or in receptacle for deliveries.) 

[  ]  Left at home (With person of suitable 

age and discretion residing there.) 

Signature ► 

Printed Name 

 

 

1602FAJ Approved October 19, 2020 
 

Order on Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage 

Page 4 of 4

Order on Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Utah state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from legacy.utcourts.gov (2023-03)
Page(s): 4
Fields(s): 86
Average fields per page: 21
Reading Level: Grade 12
LIST Grouping(s): GO-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

users1_name was name (1.00 conf)
users1_address_line_one was address (1.00 conf)
city_state_zip was city__state__zip (0.35 conf)
users1_phone_number was phone (1.00 conf)
email was email (0.38 conf)
af_f was AFF005 (0.51 conf)
page_field__1 was page_0_field_6 (0.31 conf)
page_field__2 was page_0_field_7 (0.31 conf)
county was county (0.39 conf)
judicial_district was judicial_district (0.38 conf)
order_petition_recognize was order_on_petition_to_recognize_a (0.34 conf)
and was and (0.41 conf)
docket_number was case_number (1.00 conf)
judge was judge (0.39 conf)
page_field__3 was page_0_field_14 (0.31 conf)
commissioner was commissioner (0.36 conf)
pleadings_papers_parties was the_pleadings_and_other_papers_of_the_parties (0.33 conf)
page__1 was page_1_of_4 (0.42 conf)
petitioner_attorney was petitioner_s_attorney (0.40 conf)
page_check__1 was page_0_check_1 (0.33 conf)
petitioner_practitioner was petitioner_s__licensed_paralegal_practitioner (0.34 conf)
respondent_practitioner was respondent_s__licensed_paralegal_practitioner (0.34 conf)
respondents1_name was respondent (1.00 conf)
respondent_attorney_utah_bar was respondent_s_attorney_utah_bar (0.40 conf)
matter_resolved was this_matter_is_being_resolved_by (0.42 conf)
stipulation_parties was the_stipulation_of_the_parties (0.35 conf)
default_petitioner_respondent was the_default_of_petitioner_respondent (0.49 conf)
page_check__2 was page_0_check_9 (0.33 conf)
page_check__3 was page_0_check_10 (0.33 conf)
hearing_held was a_hearing_held_on (0.31 conf)
page_field__4 was page_1_field_0 (0.31 conf)
page_field__5 was page_1_field_1 (0.36 conf)
page_field__6 was page_1_field_2 (0.36 conf)
page_field__7 was page_1_field_3 (0.36 conf)
signature_date was date (1.00 conf)
users1_signature was signature (1.00 conf)
page_field__8 was page_1_field_6 (0.36 conf)
page_field__9 was page_1_field_7 (0.36 conf)
page_field__10 was page_1_field_8 (0.36 conf)
page_field__11 was page_1_field_9 (0.36 conf)
page_field__12 was page_1_field_10 (0.36 conf)
page__2 was page_2_of_4 (0.42 conf)
present was was_present_was_not_present (0.31 conf)
represented__1 was was_represented_by (0.43 conf)
represented__2 was was_not_represented (0.41 conf)
page_check__4 was page_1_check_3 (0.26 conf)
page_check__5 was page_1_check_4 (0.26 conf)
page_check__6 was page_1_check_5 (0.26 conf)
page_check__7 was page_1_check_6 (0.26 conf)
page_check__8 was page_1_check_7 (0.26 conf)
page_check__9 was page_1_check_8 (0.26 conf)
partners_shall_considered was the_partners_shall_be_considered_married_as_of (0.37 conf)
page_check__10 was page_1_check_10 (0.26 conf)
page_check__11 was page_1_check_11 (0.26 conf)
interested_party was other_interested_party (0.36 conf)
court_orders was the_court_orders (0.42 conf)
petition_granted_denied was the_petition_is_granted_denied (0.36 conf)
page_field__13 was page_2_field_0 (0.31 conf)
page_field__14 was page_2_field_1 (0.36 conf)
practitioner was practitioner (0.29 conf)
page_field__15 was page_2_field_3 (0.36 conf)
page_field__16 was page_2_field_4 (0.36 conf)
page_field__17 was page_2_field_5 (0.36 conf)
page__3 was page_3_of_4 (0.42 conf)
page_field__18 was page_3_field_0 (0.31 conf)
page_field__19 was page_3_field_1 (0.36 conf)
page_field__20 was page_3_field_2 (0.36 conf)
page__4 was page_4_of_4 (0.42 conf)
left_home_person_suitable was left_at_home__with_person_of_suitable (0.45 conf)
mail was mail (0.38 conf)
hand_delivery was hand_delivery (0.35 conf)
e_filed was e_filed (0.48 conf)
page_check__12 was page_3_check_4 (0.26 conf)
left_business_person_charge was left_at_business__with_person_in_charge (0.48 conf)
page_check__13 was page_3_check_6 (0.26 conf)
page_check__14 was page_3_check_7 (0.26 conf)
page_check__15 was page_3_check_8 (0.26 conf)
page_check__16 was page_3_check_9 (0.26 conf)
page_check__17 was page_3_check_10 (0.26 conf)
page_check__18 was page_3_check_11 (0.26 conf)
page_check__19 was page_3_check_12 (0.26 conf)
page_check__20 was page_3_check_13 (0.26 conf)
page_check__21 was page_3_check_14 (0.26 conf)
page_check__22 was page_3_check_15 (0.26 conf)
page_check__23 was page_3_check_16 (0.26 conf)
page_check__24 was page_3_check_17 (0.26 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

Launch Form in Weaver

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

Order on Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02