Here is the text we could read:
In the District Court of Utah
__________ Judicial District ________________ County
Court Address ______________________________________________________
In the Matter of (select one)
[ ] the Marriage of (for a divorce with or without
children, annulment, separate maintenance, or
temporary separation case)
[ ] the Children of (to establish custody, parent-
time or child support)
[ ] the Parentage of the Children of (for a
paternity case)
____________________________________
(name of Petitioner)
____________________________________
(name of Respondent)
____________________________________________
Other parties (if any)
Custody Evaluation Settlement
Conference Report
(Utah Code of Judicial Administration Rule 4-
903)
_______________________________
Case Number
_______________________________
Judge
_______________________________
Commissioner
Appointed custody evaluator: _________________________________________________
Date of settlement conference: _______________________________________________
3. Minor children
Name of child
Date of birth
Petitioner: ___________________________________________________________________
Respondent: ________________________________________________________________
1580FAF Approved December 9, 2019
/ Revised May 1, 2022
Custody Evaluation Settlement Conference Report
Page 1 of 3
and
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
Other parties evaluated:
Name of person
Relationship to children
Guardian ad Litem: __________________________________________________________
Petitioner's counsel: _________________________________________________________
Respondent's counsel: _______________________________________________________
onclusions
(Use the criteria specified Code of Judicial Administration Rule 4-903)
declare under criminal penalty under the law of Utah that everything stated in this document is true.
Signed at ______________________________________________________ (city, and state or country).
Signature ►
Printed Name
7.
8.
9.
C
I
Date
1580FAF Approved December 9, 2019
/ Revised May 1, 2022
Custody Evaluation Settlement Conference Report
Page 2 of 3
I certify that I filed with the court and am serving a copy of this Custody Evaluation Settlement
Conference Report on the following people.
Certificate of Service
Person’s Name
Service Method
Service Address
Service
Date
[ ] Mail
[ ] Hand Delivery
[ ] E-filed
[ ] Email
[ ] Left at business (With person in charge
or in receptacle for deliveries.)
[ ] Left at home (With person of suitable
age and discretion residing there.)
[ ] Mail
[ ] Hand Delivery
[ ] E-filed
[ ] Email
[ ] Left at business (With person in charge
or in receptacle for deliveries.)
[ ] Left at home (With person of suitable
age and discretion residing there.)
[ ] Mail
[ ] Hand Delivery
[ ] E-filed
[ ] Email
[ ] Left at business (With person in charge
or in receptacle for deliveries.)
[ ] Left at home (With person of suitable
age and discretion residing there.)
Date
Signature ►
Printed Name
1580FAF Approved December 9, 2019
/ Revised May 1, 2022
Custody Evaluation Settlement Conference Report
Page 3 of 3
Custody Evaluation Settlement Conference Report
This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Utah state courts.
To learn more about the project, check out our about page.
Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03)
and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.
About This Form:
- Sourced from legacy.utcourts.gov (2023-03)
- Page(s): 3
- Fields(s): 47
- Average fields per page: 15
- Reading Level: Grade 10
- LIST Grouping(s):
GO-00-00-00-00.
Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more.
Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at
RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used,
passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.
Identified Data Fields:
We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions.
When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name.
If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.
Here are the fields we could identify.
county
was county (0.54 conf)page_field__1
was page_0_field_1 (0.31 conf)judicial_district
was judicial_district (0.38 conf)custody_evaluation_settlement
was custody_evaluation_settlement (0.45 conf)unknown
was 903 (0.34 conf)docket_number
was case_number (1.00 conf)name_petitioner
was name_of_petitioner (0.39 conf)commissioner
was commissioner (0.36 conf)name_respondent
was name_of_respondent (0.39 conf)page_field__2
was page_0_field_9 (0.31 conf)appointed_custody_evaluator
was appointed_custody_evaluator (0.45 conf)name_child
was name_of_child (0.44 conf)petitioners1_name
was petitioner (1.00 conf)page__1
was page_1_of_3 (0.42 conf)marriage_divorce_without
was the_marriage_of__for_a_divorce_with_or_without (0.46 conf)parent_time_child
was the_children_of__to_establish_custody__parent__time_or_child_support (0.50 conf)parentage_paternity_case
was the_parentage_of_the_children_of__for_a__paternity_case (0.47 conf)guardian_ad_litem
was guardian_ad_litem (0.44 conf)petitioner_counsel
was petitioner_s_counsel (0.40 conf)respondent_counsel
was respondent_s_counsel (0.40 conf)signed
was signed_at (0.36 conf)city_state_country
was city__and_state_or_country (0.47 conf)signature_date
was date (1.00 conf)users1_signature
was signature (1.00 conf)page__2
was page_2_of_3 (0.42 conf)page_field__3
was page_2_field_0 (0.31 conf)page_field__4
was page_2_field_1 (0.36 conf)page_field__5
was page_2_field_2 (0.36 conf)page__3
was page_3_of_3 (0.42 conf)left_home_person_suitable
was left_at_home__with_person_of_suitable (0.45 conf)mail
was mail (0.38 conf)hand_delivery
was hand_delivery (0.35 conf)e_filed
was e_filed (0.48 conf)email
was email (0.38 conf)left_business_person_charge
was left_at_business__with_person_in_charge (0.48 conf)page_check__1
was page_2_check_6 (0.26 conf)page_check__2
was page_2_check_7 (0.26 conf)page_check__3
was page_2_check_8 (0.26 conf)page_check__4
was page_2_check_9 (0.26 conf)page_check__5
was page_2_check_10 (0.26 conf)page_check__6
was page_2_check_11 (0.26 conf)page_check__7
was page_2_check_12 (0.26 conf)page_check__8
was page_2_check_13 (0.26 conf)page_check__9
was page_2_check_14 (0.26 conf)page_check__10
was page_2_check_15 (0.26 conf)page_check__11
was page_2_check_16 (0.26 conf)page_check__12
was page_2_check_17 (0.26 conf)
We've done our best to group similar variables togther to avoid overwhelming the user.
Suggested Screen 0:
county
page_field__1
judicial_district
custody_evaluation_settlement
unknown
docket_number
name_petitioner
commissioner
name_respondent
page_field__2
appointed_custody_evaluator
name_child
petitioners1_name
page__1
marriage_divorce_without
parent_time_child
parentage_paternity_case
guardian_ad_litem
petitioner_counsel
respondent_counsel
signed
city_state_country
signature_date
users1_signature
page__2
page_field__3
page_field__4
page_field__5
page__3
left_home_person_suitable
mail
hand_delivery
e_filed
email
left_business_person_charge
page_check__1
page_check__2
page_check__3
page_check__4
page_check__5
page_check__6
page_check__7
page_check__8
page_check__9
page_check__10
page_check__11
page_check__12
Create an Interactive Version of this Form:
The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver.
To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.
Launch Form in Weaver