Here is the text we could read:
In the District Court of Utah
__________ Judicial District ________________ County
Court Address ______________________________________________________
In the Matter of (select one)
[ ] the Marriage of (for a divorce with or without
children, annulment, separate maintenance, or
temporary separation case)
[ ] the Children of (to establish custody, parent-
time or child support)
[ ] the Parentage of the Children of (for a
paternity case)
____________________________________
(name of Petitioner)
____________________________________
(name of Respondent)
____________________________________________
Other parties (if any)
Custody Evaluation Settlement
Conference Report
(Utah Code of Judicial Administration Rule 4-
903)
_______________________________
Case Number
_______________________________
Judge
_______________________________
Commissioner
Appointed custody evaluator: _________________________________________________
Date of settlement conference: _______________________________________________
3. Minor children
Name of child
Date of birth
Petitioner: ___________________________________________________________________
Respondent: ________________________________________________________________
1580FAF Approved December 9, 2019
/ Revised May 1, 2022
Custody Evaluation Settlement Conference Report
Page 1 of 3
and
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
Other parties evaluated:
Name of person
Relationship to children
Guardian ad Litem: __________________________________________________________
Petitioner's counsel: _________________________________________________________
Respondent's counsel: _______________________________________________________
onclusions
(Use the criteria specified Code of Judicial Administration Rule 4-903)
declare under criminal penalty under the law of Utah that everything stated in this document is true.
Signed at ______________________________________________________ (city, and state or country).
Signature ►
Printed Name
7.
8.
9.
C
I
Date
1580FAF Approved December 9, 2019
/ Revised May 1, 2022
Custody Evaluation Settlement Conference Report
Page 2 of 3
I certify that I filed with the court and am serving a copy of this Custody Evaluation Settlement
Conference Report on the following people.
Certificate of Service
Person’s Name
Service Method
Service Address
Service
Date
[ ] Mail
[ ] Hand Delivery
[ ] E-filed
[ ] Email
[ ] Left at business (With person in charge
or in receptacle for deliveries.)
[ ] Left at home (With person of suitable
age and discretion residing there.)
[ ] Mail
[ ] Hand Delivery
[ ] E-filed
[ ] Email
[ ] Left at business (With person in charge
or in receptacle for deliveries.)
[ ] Left at home (With person of suitable
age and discretion residing there.)
[ ] Mail
[ ] Hand Delivery
[ ] E-filed
[ ] Email
[ ] Left at business (With person in charge
or in receptacle for deliveries.)
[ ] Left at home (With person of suitable
age and discretion residing there.)
Date
Signature ►
Printed Name
1580FAF Approved December 9, 2019
/ Revised May 1, 2022
Custody Evaluation Settlement Conference Report
Page 3 of 3
Custody Evaluation Settlement Conference Report
This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Utah state courts.
To learn more about the project, check out our about page.
Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03)
and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.
About This Form:
- Sourced from legacy.utcourts.gov (2023-03)
- Page(s): 3
- Fields(s): 47
- Average fields per page: 15
- Reading Level: Grade 10
- LIST Grouping(s):
GO-00-00-00-00.
Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more.
Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at
RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used,
passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.
Identified Data Fields:
We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions.
When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name.
If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.
Here are the fields we could identify.
county was county (0.54 conf)page_field__1 was page_0_field_1 (0.31 conf)judicial_district was judicial_district (0.38 conf)custody_evaluation_settlement was custody_evaluation_settlement (0.45 conf)unknown was 903 (0.34 conf)docket_number was case_number (1.00 conf)name_petitioner was name_of_petitioner (0.39 conf)commissioner was commissioner (0.36 conf)name_respondent was name_of_respondent (0.39 conf)page_field__2 was page_0_field_9 (0.31 conf)appointed_custody_evaluator was appointed_custody_evaluator (0.45 conf)name_child was name_of_child (0.44 conf)petitioners1_name was petitioner (1.00 conf)page__1 was page_1_of_3 (0.42 conf)marriage_divorce_without was the_marriage_of__for_a_divorce_with_or_without (0.46 conf)parent_time_child was the_children_of__to_establish_custody__parent__time_or_child_support (0.50 conf)parentage_paternity_case was the_parentage_of_the_children_of__for_a__paternity_case (0.47 conf)guardian_ad_litem was guardian_ad_litem (0.44 conf)petitioner_counsel was petitioner_s_counsel (0.40 conf)respondent_counsel was respondent_s_counsel (0.40 conf)signed was signed_at (0.36 conf)city_state_country was city__and_state_or_country (0.47 conf)signature_date was date (1.00 conf)users1_signature was signature (1.00 conf)page__2 was page_2_of_3 (0.42 conf)page_field__3 was page_2_field_0 (0.31 conf)page_field__4 was page_2_field_1 (0.36 conf)page_field__5 was page_2_field_2 (0.36 conf)page__3 was page_3_of_3 (0.42 conf)left_home_person_suitable was left_at_home__with_person_of_suitable (0.45 conf)mail was mail (0.38 conf)hand_delivery was hand_delivery (0.35 conf)e_filed was e_filed (0.48 conf)email was email (0.38 conf)left_business_person_charge was left_at_business__with_person_in_charge (0.48 conf)page_check__1 was page_2_check_6 (0.26 conf)page_check__2 was page_2_check_7 (0.26 conf)page_check__3 was page_2_check_8 (0.26 conf)page_check__4 was page_2_check_9 (0.26 conf)page_check__5 was page_2_check_10 (0.26 conf)page_check__6 was page_2_check_11 (0.26 conf)page_check__7 was page_2_check_12 (0.26 conf)page_check__8 was page_2_check_13 (0.26 conf)page_check__9 was page_2_check_14 (0.26 conf)page_check__10 was page_2_check_15 (0.26 conf)page_check__11 was page_2_check_16 (0.26 conf)page_check__12 was page_2_check_17 (0.26 conf)
We've done our best to group similar variables togther to avoid overwhelming the user.
Suggested Screen 0:
countypage_field__1judicial_districtcustody_evaluation_settlementunknowndocket_numbername_petitionercommissionername_respondentpage_field__2appointed_custody_evaluatorname_childpetitioners1_namepage__1marriage_divorce_withoutparent_time_childparentage_paternity_caseguardian_ad_litempetitioner_counselrespondent_counselsignedcity_state_countrysignature_dateusers1_signaturepage__2page_field__3page_field__4page_field__5page__3left_home_person_suitablemailhand_deliverye_filedemailleft_business_person_chargepage_check__1page_check__2page_check__3page_check__4page_check__5page_check__6page_check__7page_check__8page_check__9page_check__10page_check__11page_check__12
Create an Interactive Version of this Form:
The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver.
To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.
Launch Form in Weaver