The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Utah Lists

Here is the text we could read:

In the District Court of Utah

__________ Judicial District ________________ County

Court Address ______________________________________________________

_____________________________________
Petitioner

Order Denying Request to Extend
Sexual Violence Protective Order
(Utah Code 78B-7-505)

_______________________________
Case Number

_____________________________________
Respondent

_______________________________
Judge

_______________________________
Commissioner

A hearing was held on ___________________________ (date). Respondent was given
notice and an opportunity to be heard at the hearing.

The following people were present at the hearing:

[ ] Petitioner

[ ] Respondent

[ ] Petitioner’s attorney __________________________________________ (name).

[ ] Respondent’s attorney ________________________________________ (name).

The court reviewed the Request to Extend Sexual Violence Protective Order and
(Choose all that apply.):

[ ] received argument and evidence

[ ] accepted the stipulation of the parties

[ ] entered the default of respondent for failure to appear

and makes the orders initialed below.

The court finds:

This court entered a sexual violence protective order on

___________________________ (date), which expires on

1215POF Approved December 5,
2019

Order Denying Request to Extend Sexual Violence
Protective Order

Page 1 of 2

___________________________ (date).

(Choose all that apply.):

[ ] Extending the sexual violence protective order is not necessary to protect

the petitioner or any of the people named in the order.

[ ] The request to extend was filed after the sexual violence protective order

expired.

[ ] The sexual violence protective order has already been extended.

The court orders:

The request to extend the sexual violence protective order is denied.

— The court completes this section —

Judge or commissioner’s signature may instead appear at the top of the first page of this document.

Signature ►

Commissioner

Signature ►

Judge

— Respondent completes this section —

By signing here, respondent approves the form, and accepts service of this Order
Denying Request to Extend Sexual Violence Protective Order and waives the right
to be personally served.

Respondent’s Address

espondent’s Signature ► __________________________________________________________

1215POF Approved December 5,
2019

Order Denying Request to Extend Sexual Violence
Protective Order

Page 2 of 2

Date

Order Denying Request to Extend Sexual Violence Protective Order

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Utah state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from legacy.utcourts.gov (2023-03)
Page(s): 2
Fields(s): 97
Average fields per page: 48
Reading Level: Grade 14
LIST Grouping(s): GO-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

county was county (0.54 conf)
district_court_utah was in_the_district_court_of_utah (0.34 conf)
page_field__1 was page_0_field_2 (0.31 conf)
judicial_district was judicial_district (0.38 conf)
page_field__2 was page_0_field_4 (0.31 conf)
court_address was court_address (0.42 conf)
order_denying_request_extend was order_denying_request_to_extend (0.35 conf)
page_field__3 was page_0_field_7 (0.31 conf)
page_field__4 was page_0_field_8 (0.31 conf)
page_field__5 was page_0_field_9 (0.31 conf)
page_field__6 was page_0_field_10 (0.31 conf)
page_field__7 was page_0_field_11 (0.31 conf)
page_field__8 was page_0_field_12 (0.31 conf)
page_field__9 was page_0_field_13 (0.31 conf)
sexual_violence_protective was sexual_violence_protective_order (0.33 conf)
page_field__10 was page_0_field_15 (0.31 conf)
page_field__11 was page_0_field_16 (0.31 conf)
page_field__12 was page_0_field_17 (0.31 conf)
petitioners1_name was petitioner (1.00 conf)
page_field__13 was page_0_field_19 (0.31 conf)
page_field__14 was page_0_field_20 (0.31 conf)
page_field__15 was page_0_field_21 (0.31 conf)
utah_code_b was utah_code_78b_7_505 (0.28 conf)
docket_number was case_number (1.00 conf)
page_field__16 was page_0_field_24 (0.31 conf)
judge was judge (0.39 conf)
page_field__17 was page_0_field_26 (0.31 conf)
page_field__18 was page_0_field_27 (0.31 conf)
respondents1_name was respondent (1.00 conf)
page_field__19 was page_0_field_29 (0.31 conf)
page_field__20 was page_0_field_30 (0.31 conf)
page_field__21 was page_0_field_31 (0.31 conf)
page_field__22 was page_0_field_32 (0.31 conf)
page_field__23 was page_0_field_33 (0.31 conf)
page_field__24 was page_0_field_34 (0.31 conf)
page_field__25 was page_0_field_35 (0.31 conf)
date_respondent_given was date_respondent_was_given (0.42 conf)
page_field__26 was page_0_field_37 (0.37 conf)
commissioner was commissioner (0.36 conf)
page_field__27 was page_0_field_39 (0.37 conf)
page_field__28 was page_0_field_40 (0.31 conf)
notice_opportunity_hearing was notice_and_an_opportunity_to_be_heard_at_the_hearing (0.37 conf)
page_field__29 was page_0_field_42 (0.37 conf)
page_field__30 was page_0_field_43 (0.37 conf)
following_present_hearing was the_following_people_were_present_at_the_hearing (0.39 conf)
hearing_held was a_hearing_was_held_on (0.33 conf)
users1_name was name (1.00 conf)
page_field__31 was page_0_field_47 (0.37 conf)
page_field__32 was page_0_field_48 (0.37 conf)
page_field__33 was page_0_field_49 (0.37 conf)
page_field__34 was page_0_field_50 (0.31 conf)
page_field__35 was page_0_field_51 (0.37 conf)
respondent_attorney was respondent_s_attorney (0.40 conf)
petitioner_attorney was petitioner_s_attorney (0.40 conf)
page_field__36 was page_0_field_54 (0.37 conf)
page_field__37 was page_0_field_55 (0.37 conf)
extend_sexual_violence__1 was the_court_reviewed_the_request_to_extend_sexual_violence_protective_order_and (0.39 conf)
page_field__38 was page_0_field_57 (0.37 conf)
received_argument_evidence was received_argument_and_evidence (0.34 conf)
page_field__39 was page_0_field_59 (0.37 conf)
date_expires was date_which_expires_on (0.37 conf)
extend_sexual_violence__2 was order_denying_request_to_extend_sexual_violence (0.38 conf)
pof_approved_december was 1215pof_approved_december_5 (0.42 conf)
court_sexual_violence was this_court_entered_a_sexual_violence_protective_order_on (0.32 conf)
page__1 was page_1_of_2 (0.42 conf)
page_check__1 was page_0_check_0 (0.34 conf)
page_check__2 was page_0_check_1 (0.33 conf)
page_check__3 was page_0_check_2 (0.33 conf)
page_check__4 was page_0_check_3 (0.33 conf)
page_check__5 was page_0_check_4 (0.33 conf)
accepted_stipulation_parties was accepted_the_stipulation_of_the_parties (0.37 conf)
entered_failure_appear was entered_the_default_of_respondent_for_failure_to_appear (0.41 conf)
signature_date was date (1.00 conf)
choose_apply was choose_all_that_apply (0.37 conf)
page_field__40 was page_1_field_2 (0.36 conf)
page_field__41 was page_1_field_3 (0.36 conf)
page_field__42 was page_1_field_4 (0.36 conf)
users1_signature was signature (1.00 conf)
page_field__43 was page_1_field_6 (0.36 conf)
page_field__44 was page_1_field_7 (0.36 conf)
page_field__45 was page_1_field_8 (0.36 conf)
page_field__46 was page_1_field_9 (0.36 conf)
page_field__47 was page_1_field_10 (0.36 conf)
respondent_address was respondent_s_address (0.38 conf)
page__2 was page_2_of_2 (0.42 conf)
page_field__48 was page_1_field_13 (0.36 conf)
page_field__49 was page_1_field_14 (0.36 conf)
page_field__50 was page_1_field_15 (0.36 conf)
page_field__51 was page_1_field_16 (0.36 conf)
page_field__52 was page_1_field_17 (0.36 conf)
page_field__53 was page_1_field_18 (0.36 conf)
page_field__54 was page_1_field_19 (0.36 conf)
respondent_signature was respondent_s_signature (0.47 conf)
page_field__55 was page_1_field_21 (0.36 conf)
sexual_necessary_protect was extending_the_sexual_violence_protective_order_is_not_necessary_to_protect (0.34 conf)
extend_sexual_violence__3 was the_request_to_extend_was_filed_after_the_sexual_violence_protective_order (0.38 conf)
sexual_violence_already was the_sexual_violence_protective_order_has_already_been_extended (0.25 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

Launch Form in Weaver

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

Order Denying Request to Extend Sexual Violence Protective Order

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02