The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Utah Lists

Here is the text we could read:

 
City, State, Zip 

 
Name 

 
Address 

 
Phone 

 
Email 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Check your email. You will receive information and 
documents at this email address.  

I am   [  ]  Petitioner 

[  ]  Respondent 
[  ]  Petitioner’s Attorney 
[  ]  Respondent’s Attorney                     (Utah Bar #:__________) 
[  ]  Petitioner’s Licensed Paralegal Practitioner                                          (Utah Bar #:__________) 
(Utah Bar #:__________) 

          [  ]  Respondent’s Licensed Paralegal Practitioner   

In the District Court of Utah 

__________ Judicial District ________________ County 

Court Address ______________________________________________________ 

In re marriage of 

and  

____________________________________ 

____________________________________ 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of 
Law on Petition to Recognize a 
Relationship as a Marriage 

_______________________________ 
Case Number 

_______________________________ 
Judge 

_______________________________ 
Commissioner 

The matter before the court is a Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage. 
This matter is being resolved by: 

[  ]  The default of     [  ] Petitioner     [  ] Respondent. 

[  ]  The stipulation of the parties. 

[  ]  The pleadings and other papers of the parties. 

[  ]  A hearing held on __________________________ (date), notice of which was 
served on all parties. 

1601FAJ Approved October 19, 2020 
Revised March 11, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition to 
Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage 

Page 1 of 5 

[  ] was represented by _________________________________________ (name). 

[  ] was represented by _________________________________________ (name). 

Other Interested Party _______________________________________ (name). 

[  ] was present    [  ] was not present. 

[  ] was represented by _________________________________________ (name). 

[  ] was not represented. 

Having considered the documents filed with the court, the evidence and the arguments, 
and now being fully informed, 

The court finds: 

1. 

Venue is proper because (Choose all that apply.): 

[  ]  at least one of the partners resides in this county. 

[  ]  at least one of the elements giving rise to the cause of action occurred in 

this county. 

2. 

The partners  [  ] did    [  ] did not    agree to live together as married people as 
demonstrated by the following facts: 

3. 

At the time of the agreement, the partners: 

[  ]  were    [  ] were not    at least 18 years old 

[  ]  were    [  ] were not    capable of giving consent because:  

 

   

1601FAJ Approved October 19, 2020 
Revised March 11, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition to 
Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage 

Page 2 of 5 

Petitioner  

[  ] was present    [  ] was not present. 

[  ] was not represented. 

Respondent 

[  ] was present    [  ] was not present. 

[  ] was not represented. 

[  ]  were    [  ] were not    legally capable of getting married in Utah because: 

4. 

The partners: 

[  ]  did    [  ] did not    cohabitate as demonstrated by the following facts: 

[  ]  did    [  ] did not    mutually assume marital rights, duties, and obligations as 

demonstrated by the following facts: 

[  ]  did    [  ] did not    presented themselves as married people as demonstrated 

by the following facts: 

[  ]  did    [  ] did not    had a general and uniform reputation as married people 

as demonstrated by the following facts: 

5. 

Period of cohabitation (Choose one.) 

[  ]  The partners are living together, and have been living together since  

________________________ (date). 

1601FAJ Approved October 19, 2020 
Revised March 11, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition to 
Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage 

Page 3 of 5 

 

     

     

     

     

[  ]  The relationship has ended, but the partners lived together between  

________________________ (date) and ________________________ 
(date). 

6. 

The petition  [  ] was    [  ] was not    filed during the relationship or within one 
year following the end of the relationship. 

The court concludes: 

7. 

[  ]  The petitioner has not sufficiently proved the facts necessary for the 

relationship to be recognized as a marriage, and the petition should be 
denied. 

[  ]  The petitioner has sufficiently proved the facts necessary for the relationship 
to be recognized as a marriage, and the petition should be granted. The 
partners should be considered married as of  

________________________ (date). 

ommissioner's or Judge’s signature may instead appear at the top of the first page of this document. 

Approved as to form 

Signature ► 

Commissioner 

Signature ► 

Judge 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signature ► 

Petitioner, Attorney or Licensed Paralegal 
Practitioner 

Signature ► 

Respondent, Attorney or Licensed Paralegal 
Practitioner 

  C

 
Date 

 
Date 

 
Date 

 
Date 

 

1601FAJ Approved October 19, 2020 
Revised March 11, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition to 
Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage 

Page 4 of 5 

 

 

 

 

 
Date 

 

Certificate of Service 
I certify that I filed with the court and am serving a copy of this Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 
on Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage on the following people. 

Person’s Name 

Service Method 

Service Address 

Service 
Date 

 

 

 

[  ]  Mail 
[  ]  Hand Delivery 
[  ]  E-filed 
[  ]  Email 
[  ]  Left at business (With person in charge 

or in receptacle for deliveries.) 

[  ]  Left at home (With person of suitable 

age and discretion residing there.) 

[  ]  Mail 
[  ]  Hand Delivery 
[  ]  E-filed 
[  ]  Email 
[  ]  Left at business (With person in charge 

or in receptacle for deliveries.) 

[  ]  Left at home (With person of suitable 

age and discretion residing there.) 

[  ]  Mail 
[  ]  Hand Delivery 
[  ]  E-filed 
[  ]  Email  
[  ]  Left at business (With person in charge 

or in receptacle for deliveries.) 

[  ]  Left at home (With person of suitable 

age and discretion residing there.) 

 

 

 

Signature ► 

Printed Name 

 

 

1601FAJ Approved October 19, 2020 
Revised March 11, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition to 
Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage 

Page 5 of 5

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Utah state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from legacy.utcourts.gov (2023-03)
Page(s): 5
Fields(s): 118
Average fields per page: 23
Reading Level: Grade 12
LIST Grouping(s): GO-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

users1_name was name (1.00 conf)
users1_address_line_one was address (1.00 conf)
city_state_zip was city__state__zip (0.35 conf)
users1_phone_number was phone (1.00 conf)
email was email (0.38 conf)
af_f was AFF005 (0.51 conf)
page_field__1 was page_0_field_6 (0.31 conf)
page_field__2 was page_0_field_7 (0.31 conf)
county__1 was county (0.39 conf)
judicial_district was judicial_district (0.38 conf)
findings_fact_conclusions was findings_of_fact_and_conclusions_of (0.28 conf)
and was and (0.41 conf)
docket_number was case_number (1.00 conf)
judge was judge (0.39 conf)
page_field__3 was page_0_field_14 (0.31 conf)
commissioner was commissioner (0.36 conf)
pleadings_papers_parties was the_pleadings_and_other_papers_of_the_parties (0.33 conf)
page__1 was page_1_of_5 (0.42 conf)
petitioner_attorney was petitioner_s_attorney (0.40 conf)
page_check__1 was page_0_check_1 (0.33 conf)
paralegal_practitioner_utah was petitioner_s_licensed_paralegal_practitioner_utah_bar (0.31 conf)
page_check__2 was page_0_check_3 (0.33 conf)
respondents1_name was respondent (1.00 conf)
respondent_attorney_utah_bar was respondent_s_attorney_utah_bar (0.40 conf)
matter_resolved was this_matter_is_being_resolved_by (0.42 conf)
stipulation_parties was the_stipulation_of_the_parties (0.35 conf)
default_petitioner_respondent was the_default_of_petitioner_respondent (0.49 conf)
page_check__3 was page_0_check_9 (0.33 conf)
page_check__4 was page_0_check_10 (0.33 conf)
hearing_held was a_hearing_held_on (0.31 conf)
page_field__4 was page_1_field_0 (0.31 conf)
page_field__5 was page_1_field_1 (0.36 conf)
page_field__6 was page_1_field_2 (0.36 conf)
page_field__7 was page_1_field_3 (0.36 conf)
demonstrated_following_facts__1 was demonstrated_by_the_following_facts (0.37 conf)
capable_giving_consent was were_were_not_capable_of_giving_consent_because (0.47 conf)
page__2 was page_2_of_5 (0.42 conf)
represented__1 was was_represented_by (0.43 conf)
page_check__5 was page_1_check_1 (0.26 conf)
interested_party was other_interested_party (0.36 conf)
present was was_present_was_not_present (0.31 conf)
page_check__6 was page_1_check_4 (0.26 conf)
represented__2 was was_not_represented (0.41 conf)
page_check__7 was page_1_check_6 (0.26 conf)
page_check__8 was page_1_check_7 (0.26 conf)
page_check__9 was page_1_check_8 (0.26 conf)
page_check__10 was page_1_check_9 (0.26 conf)
page_check__11 was page_1_check_10 (0.26 conf)
page_check__12 was page_1_check_11 (0.26 conf)
least_one_partners_resides was at_least_one_of_the_partners_resides_in_this_county (0.39 conf)
least_one_giving_cause was at_least_one_of_the_elements_giving_rise_to_the_cause_of_action_occurred_in (0.41 conf)
county__2 was this_county (0.41 conf)
page_check__13 was page_1_check_15 (0.26 conf)
least_years_old was were_were_not_at_least_18_years_old (0.35 conf)
page_check__14 was page_1_check_17 (0.26 conf)
page_check__15 was page_1_check_18 (0.26 conf)
page_check__16 was page_1_check_19 (0.26 conf)
legally_capable_married was were_were_not_legally_capable_of_getting_married_in_utah_because (0.41 conf)
demonstrated_following_facts__2 was did_did_not_cohabitate_as_demonstrated_by_the_following_facts (0.41 conf)
page_field__8 was page_2_field_2 (0.36 conf)
following_facts was by_the_following_facts (0.39 conf)
demonstrated_following_facts__3 was as_demonstrated_by_the_following_facts (0.33 conf)
living_together_since was the_partners_are_living_together__and_have_been_living_together_since (0.34 conf)
page__3 was page_3_of_5 (0.42 conf)
page_check__17 was page_2_check_0 (0.33 conf)
page_check__18 was page_2_check_1 (0.26 conf)
page_check__19 was page_2_check_2 (0.26 conf)
partners was the_partners (0.37 conf)
marital_rights_obligations was did_did_not_mutually_assume_marital_rights__duties__and_obligations_as (0.43 conf)
page_check__20 was page_2_check_5 (0.26 conf)
presented_people_demonstrated was did_did_not_presented_themselves_as_married_people_as_demonstrated (0.35 conf)
page_check__21 was page_2_check_7 (0.26 conf)
general_uniform_people was did_did_not_had_a_general_and_uniform_reputation_as_married_people (0.39 conf)
page_check__22 was page_2_check_9 (0.26 conf)
page_check__23 was page_2_check_10 (0.26 conf)
relationship_ended_partners was the_relationship_has_ended__but_the_partners_lived_together_between (0.40 conf)
signature_date was date (1.00 conf)
partners_considered_married was partners_should_be_considered_married_as_of (0.33 conf)
users1_signature was signature (1.00 conf)
page_field__9 was page_3_field_4 (0.36 conf)
page_field__10 was page_3_field_5 (0.36 conf)
page_field__11 was page_3_field_6 (0.36 conf)
page_field__12 was page_3_field_7 (0.36 conf)
page_field__13 was page_3_field_8 (0.36 conf)
page_field__14 was page_3_field_9 (0.36 conf)
page_field__15 was page_3_field_10 (0.36 conf)
practitioner was practitioner (0.29 conf)
page_field__16 was page_3_field_12 (0.36 conf)
page_field__17 was page_3_field_13 (0.36 conf)
page_field__18 was page_3_field_14 (0.36 conf)
page__4 was page_4_of_5 (0.42 conf)
page_check__24 was page_3_check_0 (0.33 conf)
court_concludes was the_court_concludes (0.40 conf)
page_check__25 was page_3_check_2 (0.26 conf)
petitioner_facts_necessary__1 was the_petitioner_has_not_sufficiently_proved_the_facts_necessary_for_the (0.42 conf)
petitioner_facts_necessary__2 was the_petitioner_has_sufficiently_proved_the_facts_necessary_for_the_relationship (0.37 conf)
page_field__19 was page_4_field_0 (0.31 conf)
page_field__20 was page_4_field_1 (0.36 conf)
page_field__21 was page_4_field_2 (0.36 conf)
page__5 was page_5_of_5 (0.42 conf)
left_home_person_suitable was left_at_home__with_person_of_suitable (0.45 conf)
mail was mail (0.38 conf)
hand_delivery was hand_delivery (0.35 conf)
e_filed was e_filed (0.48 conf)
page_check__26 was page_4_check_4 (0.26 conf)
left_business_person_charge was left_at_business__with_person_in_charge (0.48 conf)
page_check__27 was page_4_check_6 (0.26 conf)
page_check__28 was page_4_check_7 (0.26 conf)
page_check__29 was page_4_check_8 (0.26 conf)
page_check__30 was page_4_check_9 (0.26 conf)
page_check__31 was page_4_check_10 (0.26 conf)
page_check__32 was page_4_check_11 (0.26 conf)
page_check__33 was page_4_check_12 (0.26 conf)
page_check__34 was page_4_check_13 (0.26 conf)
page_check__35 was page_4_check_14 (0.26 conf)
page_check__36 was page_4_check_15 (0.26 conf)
page_check__37 was page_4_check_16 (0.26 conf)
page_check__38 was page_4_check_17 (0.26 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

Launch Form in Weaver

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition to Recognize a Relationship as a Marriage

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02