The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Utah Lists

Here is the text we could read:

 

 

 
Name 

 
Address 

 
Phone 

 
Email 

 
City, State, Zip 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

In the District Court of Utah 

__________ Judicial District ________________ County 

Court Address ______________________________________________________ 

In the Matter of (select one) 
 

[  ]  the Marriage of (for a divorce with or without 
children, annulment, separate maintenance, or 
temporary separation case) 

[  ]  the Children of (to establish custody, parent-

time or child support) 

[  ]  the Parentage of the Children of (for a 

paternity case) 

____________________________________ 
(name of Petitioner) 

and  

____________________________________ 
(name of Respondent) 
____________________________________________ 
Other parties (if any) 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of 
Law on Petition to Modify Parent-
time 
(Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 106) 

_______________________________ 
Case Number 

_______________________________ 
Judge 

_______________________________ 
Commissioner 

The matter before the court is a Petition to Modify Parent-time. This matter is being 
resolved by: (Choose all that apply.) 

[  ]  The default of     [  ] petitioner     [  ] respondent. 

[  ]  The stipulation of the parties. 

[  ]  The pleadings and other papers of the parties. 

[  ]  A hearing held on __________________________ (date), notice of which was 

served on all parties. 

1141FAJ Approved April 27, 2020 / 
May 1, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition 
to Modify Parent-time 

Page 1 of 5 

 

[  ]  was represented by _______________________________________ 

[  ]   was represented by _______________________________________ 

Petitioner 

[  ]  was   [  ] was not present  

[  ]  was not represented. 

Respondent 

[  ]   was   [  ] was not present  

 

 

[  ]   was not represented. 

The court finds: 

1. 

The order controlling parent-time is: 

Title of order: 

Name of Court: 

Address of 
Clerk of Court: 

Case Number: 

Date Signed: 

 

 

 

 

 

State 
Phone Number 
of Clerk of 
Court: 

Case Name 

Signed by 
Judge: 

 

 

 

 

2. 

There are ________ (number) minor children included in the controlling order.  

Child’s name 
(first, middle and last) 

Child’s 
gender 

Month and year 
of birth 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Utah [  ]  does    [  ]  does not have jurisdiction in this case.  

A material and substantial change in circumstances  [  ] has    [  ] has not     
occurred since the controlling order was entered. The court considered the 
following factors: 

1141FAJ Approved April 27, 2020 / 
May 1, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition 
to Modify Parent-time 

Page 2 of 5 

 

 

 

 

 

3. 

4. 

 

5. 

Changing parent-time    [  ]  is    [  ]  is not    in the best interest of the children. 
The court considered the following factors: 

The parties    [  ]  have    [  ]  have not    complied with the pre-filing dispute 
resolution requirements. (Utah Code 30-3-10.4(1)(c)) 

he court concludes:  

The court  [  ]  does    [  ]  does not    have jurisdiction. 

There  [  ]  are    [  ] are not    grounds to modify the controlling order. 

ommissioner’s or judge’s signature may instead appear at the top of the first page of this document. 

Signature ► 

Commissioner 

Signature ► 

Judge 

 

 

 

 

1141FAJ Approved April 27, 2020 / 
May 1, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition 
to Modify Parent-time 

Page 3 of 5 

     

     

6. 

  T

7. 

8. 

9. 

  C

 
Date 

 
Date 

     

[  ]  Other:  

   

 

Approved as to form. 

Signature ► 

Petitioner, Attorney or Licensed Paralegal 
Practitioner 

Signature ► 

Respondent, Attorney or Licensed Paralegal 
Practitioner 

 

 

 

 

 
Date 

 
Date 

 

1141FAJ Approved April 27, 2020 / 
May 1, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition 
to Modify Parent-time 

Page 4 of 5 

 

 

 

 

Certificate of Service 

I certify that I filed with the court and am serving a copy of this Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 
on Petition to Modify Parent-time on the following people. 

Person’s Name 

Service Method 

Service Address 

Service 
Date 

 

 

 

 

 
Date 

 

[  ]  Mail 
[  ]  Hand Delivery 
[  ]  E-filed 
[  ]  Email 
[  ]  Left at business (With person in charge 

or in receptacle for deliveries.) 

[  ]  Left at home (With person of suitable 

age and discretion residing there.) 

[  ]  Mail 
[  ]  Hand Delivery 
[  ]  E-filed 
[  ]  Email 
[  ]  Left at business (With person in charge 

or in receptacle for deliveries.) 

[  ]  Left at home (With person of suitable 

age and discretion residing there.) 

[  ]  Mail 
[  ]  Hand Delivery 
[  ]  E-filed 
[  ]  Email  
[  ]  Left at business (With person in charge 

or in receptacle for deliveries.) 

[  ]  Left at home (With person of suitable 

age and discretion residing there.) 

 

 

 

Signature ► 

Printed Name 

 

 

1141FAJ Approved April 27, 2020 / 
May 1, 2022 
 

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition 
to Modify Parent-time 

Page 5 of 5

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition to Modify Parent-time

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Utah state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from legacy.utcourts.gov (2023-03)
Page(s): 5
Fields(s): 90
Average fields per page: 18
Reading Level: Grade 10
LIST Grouping(s): GO-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

users1_name was name (1.00 conf)
users1_address_line_one was address (1.00 conf)
city_state_zip was city__state__zip (0.35 conf)
users1_phone_number was phone (1.00 conf)
email was email (0.38 conf)
page_field__1 was page_0_field_5 (0.31 conf)
county was county (0.39 conf)
judicial_district was judicial_district (0.38 conf)
findings_fact_conclusions was findings_of_fact_and_conclusions_of (0.28 conf)
docket_number was case_number (1.00 conf)
judge was judge (0.39 conf)
name_petitioner was name_of_petitioner (0.39 conf)
commissioner was commissioner (0.36 conf)
name_respondent was name_of_respondent (0.39 conf)
parties was other_parties__if_any (0.40 conf)
pleadings_papers_parties was the_pleadings_and_other_papers_of_the_parties (0.33 conf)
page__1 was page_1_of_5 (0.42 conf)
marriage_divorce_without was the_marriage_of__for_a_divorce_with_or_without (0.46 conf)
establish_custody_parent was the_children_of__to_establish_custody__parent (0.51 conf)
parentage_children was the_parentage_of_the_children_of__for_a (0.37 conf)
default_petitioner_respondent was the_default_of_petitioner_respondent (0.49 conf)
stipulation_parties was the_stipulation_of_the_parties (0.35 conf)
page_check__1 was page_0_check_5 (0.33 conf)
hearing_held was a_hearing_held_on (0.31 conf)
resolved_choose_apply was resolved_by_choose_all_that_apply (0.41 conf)
page_check__2 was page_0_check_8 (0.33 conf)
represented__1 was was_represented_by (0.43 conf)
page_field__2 was page_1_field_1 (0.36 conf)
date_signed was date_signed (0.42 conf)
page__2 was page_2_of_5 (0.42 conf)
petitioners1_name was petitioner (1.00 conf)
respondents1_name was respondent (1.00 conf)
present was was_was_not_present (0.35 conf)
page_check__3 was page_1_check_3 (0.26 conf)
represented__2 was was_not_represented (0.41 conf)
page_check__4 was page_1_check_5 (0.26 conf)
page_check__5 was page_1_check_6 (0.26 conf)
page_check__6 was page_1_check_7 (0.26 conf)
utah_jurisdiction_case was utah_does_does_not_have_jurisdiction_in_this_case (0.53 conf)
following_factors was following_factors (0.31 conf)
page_check__7 was page_1_check_10 (0.26 conf)
page_check__8 was page_1_check_11 (0.26 conf)
changing_time_interest was changing_parent_time_is_is_not_in_the_best_interest_of_the_children (0.37 conf)
considered_following_factors was the_court_considered_the_following_factors (0.37 conf)
other was other (0.43 conf)
users1_signature was signature (1.00 conf)
signature_date was date (1.00 conf)
page_field__3 was page_2_field_5 (0.36 conf)
page_field__4 was page_2_field_6 (0.36 conf)
page_field__5 was page_2_field_7 (0.36 conf)
page_field__6 was page_2_field_8 (0.36 conf)
page__3 was page_3_of_5 (0.42 conf)
page_check__9 was page_2_check_0 (0.33 conf)
page_check__10 was page_2_check_1 (0.26 conf)
parties_complied_filing_dispute was the_parties_have_have_not_complied_with_the_pre_filing_dispute (0.50 conf)
requirements_utah_code_c was resolution_requirements_utah_code_30_3_10_4_1__c (0.39 conf)
court_concludes was the_court_concludes (0.40 conf)
page_check__11 was page_2_check_5 (0.26 conf)
page_check__12 was page_2_check_6 (0.26 conf)
page_check__13 was page_2_check_7 (0.26 conf)
page_check__14 was page_2_check_8 (0.26 conf)
page_field__7 was page_3_field_0 (0.31 conf)
page_field__8 was page_3_field_1 (0.36 conf)
practitioner was practitioner (0.29 conf)
page_field__9 was page_3_field_3 (0.36 conf)
page_field__10 was page_3_field_4 (0.36 conf)
page_field__11 was page_3_field_5 (0.36 conf)
page__4 was page_4_of_5 (0.42 conf)
page_field__12 was page_4_field_0 (0.31 conf)
page_field__13 was page_4_field_1 (0.36 conf)
page_field__14 was page_4_field_2 (0.36 conf)
page__5 was page_5_of_5 (0.42 conf)
left_home_person_suitable was left_at_home__with_person_of_suitable (0.45 conf)
mail was mail (0.38 conf)
hand_delivery was hand_delivery (0.35 conf)
e_filed was e_filed (0.48 conf)
page_check__15 was page_4_check_4 (0.26 conf)
left_business_person_charge was left_at_business__with_person_in_charge (0.48 conf)
page_check__16 was page_4_check_6 (0.26 conf)
page_check__17 was page_4_check_7 (0.26 conf)
page_check__18 was page_4_check_8 (0.26 conf)
page_check__19 was page_4_check_9 (0.26 conf)
page_check__20 was page_4_check_10 (0.26 conf)
page_check__21 was page_4_check_11 (0.26 conf)
page_check__22 was page_4_check_12 (0.26 conf)
page_check__23 was page_4_check_13 (0.26 conf)
page_check__24 was page_4_check_14 (0.26 conf)
page_check__25 was page_4_check_15 (0.26 conf)
page_check__26 was page_4_check_16 (0.26 conf)
page_check__27 was page_4_check_17 (0.26 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

Launch Form in Weaver

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Petition to Modify Parent-time

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02