Here is the text we could read:
ER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2021, the Application for Relief, filed pursuant
to Rule of Judicial Administration 1952(B)(2), is DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The instant Application requests that this Court authorize the President Judge to
implement local Emergency Judicial Order No. 20-3264, captioned “In re Court Action to
Reduce Evictions.” Relatedly, the Application asks that, “insofar as timeframes outlined
[in that Order] conflict with any statutorily provided timeframes for eviction actions, [the
President Judge be empowered] to temporarily suspend operation of those rules[.]”
Application at 2.
To the extent the Application seeks the authority to suspend statutory provisions,
the Application identifies no passage of Rule of Judicial Administration 1952 that would
permit empowering a President Judge to suspend a statute, and this Court is unlikely to
grant such relief absent a robust showing of legal authority and compelling need.
Insofar as the Application seeks permission for the President Judge to suspend
procedural rules, it is noted that the Application offers no detailed, particular account of
the present status of the distribution of emergency rental assistance funds in Berks
County. See, e.g., In re 7th Judicial Dist., 43 MM 2020 (in an application submitted by the
President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, detailing precisely how
ORDER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT
No. 53 MM 2020
:
:
:
IN RE: 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
DECLARATION OF JUDICIAL
EMERGENCY (BERKS COUNTY)
P
much emergency rental assistance had been received and distributed to date in that
county); In re 5th Judicial Dist., 23 WM 2020 (in an application submitted by the President
Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, providing county-specific data
as to the amount of emergency rental assistance received and distributed to date, the
number of applications received, and the average processing time for such applications).
Respectfully, absent such detailed information, the Application fails to establish that the
present status of landlord-tenant matters in Berks County constitutes a judicial emergency
to support granting the President Judge the authority to suspend procedural rules on a
temporary basis. See Pa.R.J.A. 1952(B)(2)(m) (indicating that, in the context of a local
judicial emergency, the Supreme Court may empower the President Judge to suspend or
modify statewide court rules).
[53 MM 2020] - 2
Aug. 13 - Berks County - 53 MM 2020 - Order Denying App for Relief
This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Pennsylvania state courts.
To learn more about the project, check out our about page.
Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03)
and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.
About This Form:
- Sourced from www.pacourts.us (2023-03)
- Page(s): 2
- Fields(s): 7
- Average fields per page: 3
- Reading Level: Grade 16
- LIST Grouping(s):
CO-00-00-00-00, CO-07-00-00-00.
Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more.
Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at
RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used,
passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.
Identified Data Fields:
We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions.
When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name.
If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.
Here are the fields we could identify.
middle_district
was middle_district (0.44 conf)af_f
was AFF001 (0.51 conf)supreme_court_pennsylvania
was in_the_supreme_court_of_pennsylvania (0.38 conf)declaration_judicial
was declaration_of_judicial (0.46 conf)rule_administration_without
was to_rule_of_judicial_administration_1952_b__2_is_denied__without_prejudice (0.40 conf)court_authorize_judge
was the_instant_application_requests_that_this_court_authorize_the_president_judge_to (0.48 conf)statutorily_provided_actions
was in_that_order__conflict_with_any_statutorily_provided_timeframes_for_eviction_actions_the (0.42 conf)
We've done our best to group similar variables togther to avoid overwhelming the user.
Suggested Screen 0:
Suggested Screen 1:
Suggested Screen 2:
supreme_court_pennsylvania
court_authorize_judge
Suggested Screen 3:
declaration_judicial
rule_administration_without
statutorily_provided_actions
Create an Interactive Version of this Form:
The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver.
To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.
Launch Form in Weaver