Here is the text we could read:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF ____________
ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY
RELIEF FROM ABUSE
ORZECZENIE SĄDU ODDALAJĄCE WNIOSEK
O DORAŹNE ŚRODKI ZABEZPIECZAJĄCE
PRZED MALTRETOWANIEM
Mag. Dist. No:
Okręg Magist. Nr
MDJ Name:
Nazwisko S.M.
Address:
Adres
Telephone:
Telefon
_________________________
vs.
_________________________
Docket No / Sygn. akt:
Case Filed / Sprawa wpłynęła:
ORDER
DENYING EMERGENCY PROTECTION FROM ABUSE
ORZECZENIE SĄDU
ODDALAJĄCE WNIOSEK O DORAŹNE ŚRODKI
ZABEZPIECZAJĄCE PRZED MALTRETOWANIEM
At an ex parte hearing held on ____________________, I
have found that it is not necessary to issue a protective order
and the petition for emergency relief is denied.
Po posiedzeniu zaocznym (ex parte) z dnia ____________________
stwierdzam brak konieczności wydania nakazu
zabezpieczającego. W związku z tym Sąd oddala wniosek
o doraźne środki zabezpieczające.
________________________________________
Date / Dnia
________________________________________________
Magisterial District Judge / Sędzia Okręgu Magistrackiego
MDJS 307E-BL (Polish)
1
Date Created: December 26, 2016
Polish Order Denying Emergency Relief From Abuse-307 E
This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Pennsylvania state courts.
To learn more about the project, check out our about page.
Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03)
and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.
About This Form:
- Sourced from www.pacourts.us (2023-03)
- Page(s): 1
- Fields(s): 7
- Average fields per page: 7
- Reading Level: Grade 8
- LIST Grouping(s):
GO-00-00-00-00.
Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more.
Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at
RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used,
passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.
Identified Data Fields:
We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions.
When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name.
If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.
Here are the fields we could identify.
count
was COUNTY OF (0.54 conf)vs
was vs (0.33 conf)undefined
was undefined (0.38 conf)found_necessary_order
was have found that it is not necessary to issue a protective order (0.37 conf)fill__1
was fill_4 (0.36 conf)date_dnia
was Date Dnia (0.42 conf)fill__2
was fill_7 (0.36 conf)
We've done our best to group similar variables togther to avoid overwhelming the user.
Suggested Screen 0:
Suggested Screen 1:
Suggested Screen 2:
count
found_necessary_order
fill__1
date_dnia
fill__2
Create an Interactive Version of this Form:
The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver.
To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.
Launch Form in Weaver