Here is the text we could read:
Judicial Budget
Request 2022-23
In 2021 Pennsylvania Courts...
AUTISM
(cid:31)(cid:30)(cid:29)(cid:28)(cid:27)(cid:26)(cid:25)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:30)(cid:22)
LISTEN . LEARN . EDUCATE .
A CONVERSATION ABOUT AUTISM AND THE COURTS
J U L Y 2 9 , 2 0 2 1 � H O T E L H E R S H E Y
Created an
9:00 - 9:30 Breakfast
9:45 - 11:00
9:30 - 9:45 Dougherty Welcome
Call to Action
Autism in
the courts
task force
Judicial Conference and Listening Tour Debrief
Brief Recap of Judges Training
Kickoff event/Regional roundtables
Statistics
Common themes
11:15 - 11:30 Continuing Judicial Education
Opportunities moving forward
justice issues for people
to examine access to
11:30 - 12:30 Task Force Creation
Goal
Members
Scope
Budget/Grant opportunities
Partnerships
Centralizing resources
Communication and collaboration
Subcommittees
Disorder (ASD) and
with an Autism Spectrum
Stakeholder and National Discussion – Communication and Collaboration
Engaging the Legislature
Benchbook and Media
explore ways to educate
12:30 - 1:15 Lunch
judges and the public
1:15 - end
Taskforce Creation Continued
that will lead to a better
understanding of and
communication with
these individuals.
Facilitated
36,231
requests for interpreters.
Continued to implement the Clean Slate
Act through a system that automatically
removes certain criminal history record
information from public view.
Nearly
42 million
cases have been sealed (as of Jan. 1)
Developed and launched a social
media campaign about
recognizing
the signs of
domestic abuse
and creating plans to help keep victims
and their families safe.
Over 85 percent
of all guardianship reports received by the courts
were electronically filed using GTS.
Guardianship Tracking System
Used the Guardianship Tracking System
(GTS) to monitor
family/lay
guardians
and
382
19,261
serving in the Commonwealth.
professional
guardians
Monitored
18,380
active guardianship cases with
assets totaling over
$1.7 billion
under court supervision.
Court Technology
Over 1,000
law enforcement agencies are now electronically filing
traffic/parking citations and criminal complaints.
PAePay saw a record
$164 million
collected
online in 2021, a 5 percent increase over last year.
Nearly 2.15 million
cases were docketed in 2021 and over 104 million
docket sheets were viewed.
Collections
Collecting fines, fees, costs and restitution
is a priority for the judiciary – with nearly
$423 million
collected
in 2019 alone. These dollars flow back
into the state budget and Pennsylvania
communities, and to victims of crime.
State ($203 million)
Local governments ($177 million)
Victims of crime ($39 million)
Airports, parking authorities, libraries,
schools, etc. ($4 million)
Over the last 10 years, AOPC/IT collected and processed nearly
$4.6 billion in fines, costs, and restitution. This year saw a
$20 million increase in funds distributed over last year.
Proposed 2022-2023 Funding
Total budget: $518.9 million
$391.8 million
(state tax funds)
$72.3 million
(Act 49)
$7.6 million
(other fees)
$1.6 million
(federal funds)
$45.6 million
(JCS fees)
The judiciary receives about
2 of 1 percent
1
/
of the state budget.
Fee revenue has been used to fund a portion
of the judiciary’s annual general fund budget,
currently about 16%.
Saving Tax Dollars
The judiciary is committed
to spending taxpayer dollars
wisely, and has saved over
$9.6 million in the past year.
$6.2 million saved (realignment of MDJ courts)
$2.7 million saved (benefits/salary)
$0.7 million saved (contract savings)
Over the past 10 years, the judiciary has saved a combined $95.2 million.
Problem-Solving Courts
In 2020 . . .
1,396 participants graduated successfully.
443 became employed between admission and discharge.
244 improved their level of education.
Breaking New Ground in Judicial Education
In 2021, 591 judges recorded 10,442 hours
of continuing judicial education, an average of 17.66 hours per judge.
Topics of judicial education:
Emerging Issues in Elder Law
Establishing a Trauma-Informed Courtroom
Medical Marijuana: Implications for Pennsylvania Courts
COVID-related Insurance Issues
What is “Deep Fake” and How Will It Impact Courts?
Contemporary Issues in Judicial Ethics
Chief Justice Max Baer
Justice Debra Todd
Justice Christine Donohue
Justice Kevin M. Dougherty
Justice David N. Wecht
Justice Sallie Updyke Mundy
Justice P. Kevin Brobson
(Untitled)
This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Pennsylvania state courts.
To learn more about the project, check out our about page.
Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03)
and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.
About This Form:
- Sourced from www.pacourts.us (2023-03)
- Page(s): 4
- Fields(s): 21
- Average fields per page: 5
- Reading Level: Grade 11
- LIST Grouping(s):
CO-00-00-00-00.
Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more.
Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at
RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used,
passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.
Identified Data Fields:
We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions.
When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name.
If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.
Here are the fields we could identify.
page_field__1 was page_0_field_0 (0.52 conf)domestic_abuse was domestic_abuse (0.39 conf)page_field__2 was page_0_field_2 (0.31 conf)page_field__3 was page_1_field_0 (0.31 conf)page_field__4 was page_1_field_1 (0.36 conf)percent was over_85_percent (0.36 conf)total_budget_million was total_budget_518_9_million (0.34 conf)judiciary_committed was the_judiciary_is_committed (0.41 conf)page_field__5 was page_2_field_2 (0.36 conf)page_field__6 was page_2_field_3 (0.36 conf)page_field__7 was page_2_field_4 (0.36 conf)wisely_saved was wisely__and_has_saved_over (0.35 conf)page_field__8 was page_2_field_6 (0.36 conf)page_field__9 was page_2_field_7 (0.36 conf)collections was collections (0.37 conf)page_field__10 was page_3_field_0 (0.31 conf)page_field__11 was page_3_field_1 (0.36 conf)issues_judicial_ethics was contemporary_issues_in_judicial_ethics (0.40 conf)page_field__12 was page_3_field_3 (0.36 conf)problem_solving_courts was problem_solving_courts (0.49 conf)emerging_issues_elder_law was emerging_issues_in_elder_law (0.41 conf)
We've done our best to group similar variables togther to avoid overwhelming the user.
Suggested Screen 0:
page_field__1domestic_abusepage_field__2page_field__3page_field__4percenttotal_budget_millionjudiciary_committedpage_field__5page_field__6page_field__7wisely_savedpage_field__8page_field__9collectionspage_field__10page_field__11issues_judicial_ethicspage_field__12problem_solving_courtsemerging_issues_elder_law
Create an Interactive Version of this Form:
The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver.
To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.
Launch Form in Weaver
