The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Michigan Lists

Here is the text we could read:

Approved, SCAO

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
COUNTY

Original - Court
1st copy - Issuing tribunal
2nd copy - Respondent

ORDER REGARDING REGISTRATION OF
OUT-OF-STATE CHILD-CUSTODY
DETERMINATION (UCCJEA)

3rd copy - Petitioner
4th copy - Friend of the court

CASE NO.

Court address

FAX no.

Court telephone no.

Petitioner name, address, and telephone no.

Respondent name, address, and telephone no.

Attorney:

1. An order issued by

in this county on

Date

Name of issuing tribunal and state

providing for custody/parenting time was registered

2. A notice of registration of out-of-state child-custody determination, dated

, was served on the

respondent.

THE COURT FINDS:

IT IS ORDERED:

a. The respondent did not request a hearing within 21 days from the date of the notice.
b. The respondent challenged the validity of the enforcement of the order and evidence was presented.
c. The respondent requested a hearing but failed to appear.
d. The issuing state lacked jurisdiction to make the determination.
e. The child-custody determination has been vacated, stayed, or modified by a court of a state having jurisdiction to do so.
f. The respondent did not receive proper notice before the child-custody determination was issued.

a. The registration is confirmed. Confirmation of a registered child-custody determination, whether by operation of law or

after notice and hearing, precludes further contest of the child-custody determination with respect to a matter that could
have been asserted at the time of registration.

b. The registration is vacated.

Date

Judge

Bar no.

CC 389 (3/09) ORDER REGARDING REGISTRATION OF OUT-OF-STATE CHILD-CUSTODY DETERMINATION

MCL 722.1304

Order Regarding Registration of Out-of-State Child-Custody Determination (formerly FOC 99a)

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from www.courts.michigan.gov/Domestic-Relations (2023-03)
Page(s): 1
Fields(s): 21
Average fields per page: 21
Reading Level: Grade 9
LIST Grouping(s): CO-07-00-00-00, FA-00-00-00-00, CO-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

petitioner_name_address was Petitioner name address and telephone no (0.62 conf)
respondent_name_address was Respondent name address and telephone no (0.40 conf)
cas_e was CASE NO (0.47 conf)
name_issuing_tribunal_state was Name of issuing tribunal and state (0.49 conf)
signature_date__1 was Date (1.00 conf)
served was was served on the (0.27 conf)
request_hearing_date was a The respondent did not request a hearing within 21 days from the date of the notice (0.37 conf)
validity_evidence_presented was b The respondent challenged the validity of the enforcement of the order and evidence was presented (0.41 conf)
c_respondent_requested_hearing_failed_appear was c The respondent requested a hearing but failed to appear (0.39 conf)
issuing_lacked_jurisdiction was d The issuing state lacked jurisdiction to make the determination (0.38 conf)
vacated_court_jurisdiction was e The childcustody determination has been vacated stayed or modified by a court of a state having jurisdiction to do so (0.48 conf)
f_respondent_receive_proper_notice_childcustody_determination_issued was f The respondent did not receive proper notice before the childcustody determination was issued (0.42 conf)
registration_registered was a The registration is confirmed Confirmation of a registered childcustody determination whether by operation of law or (0.40 conf)
b_registration_vacated was b The registration is vacated (0.37 conf)
signature_date__2 was Date_2 (1.00 conf)
bar was Bar no (0.41 conf)
stat_e_f_n_l_county was STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY (0.46 conf)
stat_e_f_n_l_count was STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY2 (0.42 conf)
text__1 was Text3 (0.35 conf)
text__2 was Text4 (0.35 conf)
text__3 was Text5 (0.35 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

Order Regarding Registration of Out-of-State Child-Custody Determination (formerly FOC 99a)

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02