The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Michigan Lists

Here is the text we could read:

THE PEOPLE OF

The State of Michigan

Date of probation

Term of probation

Judge

Offense

Defendant’s name, address, and telephone no.

CTN/TCN

SID

Defendant’s attorney’s name

Bar no.

THE COURT FINDS:

1. A probation violation has not been proven by a preponderance of the evidence. (Check item 5.)

2. A probation violation has been proven by a preponderance of the evidence. Specific factual and legal findings were
made on the record. (Note: If the court finds defendant willfully violated the Sex Offenders Registration Act, probation must be revoked.)

3. A probation violation is found based on defendant’s plea of

guilty.

nolo contendere.

4. The violation is a technical probation violation. It is technical violation number

No.

5. The probation violation charge is dismissed. Defendant’s probation previously ordered shall continue.

IT IS ORDERED:

6. Defendant’s probation is:

continued.

extended until

revoked.

modified, as follows:

7. A sentencing hearing is scheduled on

Date and time

8. An amended order of probation shall be prepared by the appropriate agency.

Approved, SCAO
Form MC 433, Rev. 3/21
MCL 771.4, MCL 771.4a, MCL 771.4b, MCR 6.445
Page 1 of 1

Judge signature and date

Distribute form to:
Court
Probation Department
Defendant
Prosecutor

STATE OF MICHIGANJUDICIAL DISTRICTJUDICIAL CIRCUITORDER FOLLOWING PROBATIONVIOLATION HEARINGCASE NO. and JUDGEORIMI-Court addressCourt telephone no.

MC 433, Order Following Probation Violation Hearing

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from www.courts.michigan.gov/probation (2023-03)
Page(s): 1
Fields(s): 40
Average fields per page: 40
Reading Level: Grade 10
LIST Grouping(s): CO-07-00-00-00, CR-00-00-00-00, CO-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

stat_e_f_n_l_circuit was STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDICIAL CIRCUIT (0.62 conf)
name_address_telephone was Defendants name address and telephone no (0.37 conf)
undefined__1 was undefined_2 (0.39 conf)
ctntcn was CTNTCN (0.35 conf)
sid was SID (0.35 conf)
date_probation was Date of probation (0.47 conf)
defendants_attorneys_name_bar was Defendants attorneys name Bar no (0.46 conf)
term_probation was Term of probation (0.43 conf)
offense was Offense (0.28 conf)
probation_evidence_check was 1 A probation violation has not been proven by a preponderance of the evidence Check item 4 (0.41 conf)
probation_violation_evidence was 2 A probation violation has been proven by a preponderance of the evidence Specific factual and legal findings were (0.39 conf)
probation_defendants_plea was 3 A probation violation is found based on defendants plea of (0.43 conf)
violation_probation_number was 4 The violation is a technical probation violation It is technical violation number (0.37 conf)
guilty was guilty (0.45 conf)
nolo_contendere was nolo contendere (0.46 conf)
probation_ordered_shall was 5 The probation violation charge is dismissed Defendants probation previously ordered shall continue (0.48 conf)
defendants_probation was 6 Defendants probation is (0.44 conf)
sentencing_hearing_scheduled was 7 A sentencing hearing is scheduled on (0.31 conf)
probation_shall_appropriate was 8 An amended order of probation shall be prepared by the appropriate agency (0.49 conf)
continued was continued (0.41 conf)
extended was extended until (0.39 conf)
revoked was revoked (0.47 conf)
modified_follows was modified as follows (0.37 conf)
undefined__2 was undefined_3 (0.39 conf)
undefined__3 was undefined_4 (0.39 conf)
unknown__1 was 1 (0.38 conf)
unknown__2 was 2 (0.38 conf)
unknown__3 was 3 (0.38 conf)
date_time was Date and time (0.34 conf)
text__1 was Text1 (0.35 conf)
cas_e was CASE NO (0.47 conf)
judge__1 was Judge (0.39 conf)
text__2 was Text3 (0.35 conf)
text__3 was Text4 (0.35 conf)
text__4 was Text5 (0.35 conf)
state_michigan was The State of Michigan (0.46 conf)
checkbox was checkbox (0.29 conf)
judge__2 was Judge2 (0.35 conf)
no was No (0.45 conf)
bar was bar no (0.41 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

MC 433, Order Following Probation Violation Hearing

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02