The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Michigan Lists

Here is the text we could read:

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT - FAMILY DIVISION
COUNTY

ORDER AFTER REMOVAL HEARING
(CHILD PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS)

ORDER 

 

 OF 
 

CASE NO.

PETITION NO.

JUDGE

Court address

Court telephone no.

In the matter of 

First and last name(s), alias(es)

1. Date of hearing: 

 

THE COURT FINDS:

 

  Judge/Referee: 

 

2. 

 a. This emergency removal hearing is held 

 

 preadjudication 

 

 postadjudication 

  under MCR 3.974(C). 

 

        Protective custody of the child(ren) was already ordered on 
 (form JC 05b or other).
 
        Taking the child(ren) into protective custody was necessary to protect the health, safety, or welfare of the child(ren), 
        and it 
 Contrary to the welfare findings were made in the order authorizing the emergency removal (form JC 05b or other).
       
       
 Each parent, guardian, or legal custodian from whom the child(ren) was/were removed has received a written    
            statement of the reasons for the emergency removal and has been advised of his/her rights in accordance with 
            MCR 3.974(C)(3).

  necessary that removal continue pending the next hearing (see item 17).

 is not 

 is 

 

 

 preadjudication 

 postadjudication 

 b. This removal hearing is held 

  under MCR 3.974(B). The child(ren) 

 is not necessary.
 is necessary. Under MCL 712A.2(b) and MCR 3.965(C) there is reasonable cause to believe:

 
        has not/have not been removed prior to this hearing and an order to take the child(ren) into protective custody
       
       
            1) the child(ren) is/are at substantial risk of harm or is/are in surroundings that present an imminent risk of harm
                and the child(ren)’s immediate removal from those surroundings is necessary to protect the child(ren)’s health 
                and safety,
            2) the circumstances warrant issuing this order,
            3) consistent with the circumstances, reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate the need for removal 
                of the child(ren) as stated in item 6,
            4) no remedy other than protective custody is reasonably available to protect the child(ren), and
            5) continuing to reside in the home is contrary to the child(ren)’s welfare because: (Attach separate sheets as necessary.)

3. The parent(s), guardian, or legal custodian were present and/or attempts were made to secure the presence of each 
  parent, guardian, or legal custodian.

4. The lawyer-guardian ad litem for the child(ren) was present.

 5. The child(ren) is/are Indian as defined in MCR 3.002(12). The petitioner 
    removal hearing as required by MCR 3.920(C)(1).
   
   

 The hearing must be adjourned pending conclusion of a removal hearing required by MCR 3.967.
 The removal hearing required by MCR 3.967 was conducted in conjunction with this hearing (see required findings in item 9).

  has not  given notice of this

  has 

 , testified as required by law.

    A qualified expert, 

Name

Approved, SCAO
Form JC 75, Rev. 10/20
MCL 712A.13a, MCR 3.002, MCR 3.920(C)(2)(a), MCR 3.965(C), 
MCR 3.974, MCR 3.979(F)(2)
Page 1 of 4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

   

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 

PCS Code: RMH/OFETCS Code: ERH/OFEROrder After Removal Hearing (Child Protective Proceedings) 
Page 2 of 4

(10/20) 

Case No. 
 

 a. Consistent with the circumstances, reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal of the child(ren) from the

 6. 
             home were made as determined in the order authorizing the emergency removal (form JC 05b or other).   OR
 b. Consistent with the circumstances, reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate removal of the child(ren)
   
             from the home. Those efforts include: (Specify below.) 
 
   
 c.  The child(ren) is/are Indian, and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence and the testimony of a qualified
            expert witness who has knowledge about the child-rearing practices of the Indian child’s tribe, that active efforts
           
            prevent the breakup of the Indian family. These efforts have proved 
            the continued custody of the child(ren) by the parent or Indian custodian 
            in serious emotional or physical damage to the child(ren), and the child(ren) 
            be removed from the home. (Specify below.)
    The efforts for 6b. or 6c. are: (Specify the efforts from 6b. or 6c. here. If the child is an Indian child, specify active efforts as defined by  
    MCR 3.002[1] and MCL 712B.3[a].)

  been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to 

 unsuccessful, 
 

 successful, 
 

likely to result 
 should not 

 
 is not 
 

 
 should 

 have not 

 is 
 

 have 

OR   

 

 

 

 

   

 d. Reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal of the child(ren) from the home were not made.

 7. a. Reasonable efforts are not required to prevent or eliminate the child(ren)’s removal from the home due to the
       
       

  subjecting the child(ren) to the aggravated circumstance(s) of

 as provided in section MCL 722.638(1) and (2), and as evidenced

 mother 

 father 

 

 .

 

 father’s 
 father’s 
 father’s 

 mother’s 
 mother’s 
 mother’s 

conviction for murder of another child of the parent.
conviction for voluntary manslaughter of another child of the parent.
conviction for aiding or abetting in the murder or manslaughter of 

       
       
       
            another child of the parent, attempting to murder the child(ren) or another child of the parent, or conspiring or 
            soliciting to commit the murder of the child(ren) or another child of the parent.
       
            child(ren) or another child of the parent.
       
            and failure by that parent to rectify the conditions that led to that termination.
       

being required to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act. 

involuntary termination of parental rights to a sibling of the child(ren) 

conviction for felony assault that resulted in serious bodily injury to the

 mother’s 

 mother’s 

 mother   

 father’s 

 father’s 

 father 

 not required because the parent subjected the child or another child of the parent to one of the circumstances 

    b. Reasonable efforts to preserve and reunify the family to make it possible for the child(ren) to safely return home are 
       
            stated above. 
            OR
       

 still recommended because: 

     (When item 7 is checked, either complete item 9 below or schedule a permanency planning hearing within 28 days of this determination.) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

        by  
 

       

       

Order After Removal Hearing (Child Protective Proceedings) 
Page 3 of 4

(10/20) 

Case No. 
 

 b. Reasonable efforts shall not be made to preserve and reunify the family because it would be detrimental to the

 a. Reasonable efforts shall be made to preserve and reunify the family to make it possible for the child(ren) to 

 8. 
            safely return home.
   
            child(ren)’s health and safety.
   
 9. Because reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal or to reunite the child(ren) and family are not required,
    a permanency planning hearing was conducted. (Use and attach form JC 19, Order Following Dispositional Review/Permanency  
    Planning Hearing.)

0.  Custody of the child(ren) with the parent/guardian/legal custodian

 a. presents a substantial risk of harm to the child(ren)’s life, physical health, or mental well-being.

 No provision of service or other arrangement except removal of the child(ren) is reasonably available to 

 
         
              adequately safeguard the child(ren) from the risk of harm to the child(ren)’s life, physical health, or mental 
              well-being.
         
              is/are placed are adequate to safeguard the child(ren)’s health and welfare.
 

 b. does not present a substantial risk of harm to the child(ren)’s life, physical health, or mental well-being.

 Conditions of custody at the placement away from the home and with the individual with whom the child(ren) 

 11. 
     

 a. All siblings are in joint placement.
 b. All siblings are not in joint placement because:

 

              Sibling contact 

 is occurring according to law. 

 is not occurring because (see item 15 to order sibling contact):

 12.  Parenting time with 
 
  

 
IT IS ORDERED:

 , even if supervised, may be harmful to the child(ren).

 a. is/are placed with the department for care and supervision, and

 13.  The child(ren) 
      
               1) the parent(s), guardian, or legal custodian shall execute all documents necessary to release confidential
                  information regarding the child(ren), including medical, mental, and educational reports, and shall also, 
                  within 7 days, provide the department with the name(s) and address(es) of the medical provider(s) for the 
                  child(ren). Any medical provider of the child(ren) shall release the medical records of the child(ren) to the 
                  department.
              2) if the child(ren) is/are placed in the home of a relative, a home study shall be performed by the department 
                  and a copy of the home study submitted to the court not more than 30 days after the placement.
               3) upon request, the department shall release to the foster parent the information concerning the child(ren) in
                  accordance with MCL 712A.13a(15).
             
                  is authorized to enter the premises located at 
 
                  This authorization to enter the premises and take the child(ren) into protective custody expires 
 
                 
      

 The child(ren) shall be taken into protective custody. To effect this order,  
 

 under the supervision of the

 b.  is/are released to 

 Enter on LEIN

 . 
 .

Name(s) of parent(s), guardian, or legal custodian

 The following terms and conditions apply to the parent(s), guardian, or legal custodian:

 a psychological evaluation 

 

 counseling  

 

to determine appropriateness and conditions of 

              department. 
   

         
 14.  The child(ren) named 
      shall have 
      parenting time.

 

 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

   

 

 

 
 

  1

Order After Removal Hearing (Child Protective Proceedings) 
Page 4 of 4

(10/20) 

Case No. 
 

IT IS ORDERED: (continued) 
 

 15.  Sibling contact shall be as follows:

 a. Parenting time of 
 
 unsupervised.   
 The department has discretion to allow unsupervised or supervised parenting time by its designee.

 supervised until further order of the court.

 b.  Parenting time of  
 
 unsupervised.   
 The department has discretion to allow unsupervised or supervised parenting time by its designee.

 supervised until further order of the court.

     
             
             

 c.  Parenting time of 
 
 unsupervised.   
 The department has discretion to allow unsupervised or supervised parenting time by its designee.

 supervised until further order of the court.

 

 17. This matter is set for 
 
 
 

 an adjudication (within 63 days of removal under MCR 3.972[A])
 a dispositional hearing (within 28 days of removal under MCR 3.974[D][1])
 a dispositional review hearing (within 14 days of removal under MCR 3.974[D][2])

   

 18. This matter is set for an Indian child removal hearing on 

 under MCR 3.967. 

 

 

The petitioner shall give notice of these proceedings as required by MCR 3.920(C)(2). (Use form JC 48.)

 on 

Date and time

Date and time

 16. 
             
             
   
     
             
             

     

 d. 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 

 
 
 

 

 

before 

Name

 19.  Other: 

 is 

 is

 is 

 .

 

                     

Recommended by:

Referee signature and date

 

                     

Judge signature and date

JC 75, Order After Removal Hearing (Child Protective Proceedings)

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from www.courts.michigan.gov/juvenile-proceedings (2023-03)
Page(s): 4
Fields(s): 128
Average fields per page: 32
Reading Level: Grade 12
LIST Grouping(s): Unknown

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

stat_e_n_l_county was STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FAMILY DIVISION COUNTY (0.64 conf)
order was ORDER (0.32 conf)
of was OF (0.38 conf)
matter was In the matter of (0.33 conf)
date_hearing was 1 Date of hearing (0.37 conf)
judge_referee was JudgeReferee (0.46 conf)
removal_hearing_held was a This emergency removal hearing is held (0.35 conf)
preadjudication__1 was preadjudication (0.35 conf)
postadjudication__1 was postadjudication (0.35 conf)
custody_already_ordered was Protective custody of the children was already ordered on (0.45 conf)
is was is (0.32 conf)
is_not was is not (0.34 conf)
contrary_findings_made_form was Contrary to the welfare findings were made in the order authorizing the emergency removal form JC 05b or other (0.33 conf)
parent_legal_removed was Each parent guardian or legal custodian from whom the children waswere removed has received a written (0.45 conf)
b_removal_hearing_held was b This removal hearing is held (0.39 conf)
preadjudication__2 was preadjudication_2 (0.38 conf)
postadjudication__2 was postadjudication_2 (0.38 conf)
necessary was is not necessary (0.37 conf)
necessary_b_c_reasonable_cause_believe was is necessary Under MCL 712A2b and MCR 3965C there is reasonable cause to believe (0.44 conf)
children_indian_mc_r was 5 The children isare Indian as defined in MCR 300212 The petitioner (0.39 conf)
has was has (0.36 conf)
has_not was has not (0.37 conf)
hearing_must_pending_conclusion was The hearing must be adjourned pending conclusion of a removal hearing required by MCR 3967 (0.38 conf)
required_conducted_see_findings was The removal hearing required by MCR 3967 was conducted in conjunction with this hearing see required findings in item 9 (0.41 conf)
qualified_expert was A qualified expert (0.37 conf)
petition was Petition no (0.49 conf)
judge was Judge (0.39 conf)
text__1 was Text3 (0.35 conf)
text__2 was Text4 (0.35 conf)
text__3 was Text6 (0.35 conf)
page was Page 2 of 4 (0.42 conf)
undefined__1 was undefined (0.38 conf)
circumstances_prevent_eliminate_removal was a Consistent with the circumstances reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal of the children from the (0.43 conf)
circumstances_reasonable_prevent was b Consistent with the circumstances reasonable efforts were made to prevent or eliminate removal of the children (0.41 conf)
finds_clear_evidence was c The children isare Indian and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence and the testimony of a qualified (0.39 conf)
have was have (0.45 conf)
have_not was have not (0.45 conf)
unsuccessful was unsuccessful (0.43 conf)
successful_continued was successful the continued (0.37 conf)
is_2 was is_2 (0.35 conf)
is_not_2 was is not_2 (0.39 conf)
should was should (0.36 conf)
should_not was should not (0.43 conf)
prevent_eliminate_removal__1 was d Reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal of the children from the home were not made (0.37 conf)
mother__1 was mother (0.39 conf)
father__1 was father (0.36 conf)
subjecting_circumstances was subjecting the children to the aggravated circumstances of (0.39 conf)
provided_section_l_evidenced was as provided in section MCL 7226381 and 2 and as evidenced (0.34 conf)
by was by (0.38 conf)
undefined__2 was undefined_2 (0.39 conf)
mothers__1 was mothers (0.41 conf)
mothers__2 was mothers_2 (0.34 conf)
mothers__3 was mothers_3 (0.34 conf)
mothers__4 was mothers_4 (0.34 conf)
mothers__5 was mothers_5 (0.34 conf)
mother__2 was mother_2 (0.33 conf)
fathers__1 was fathers (0.39 conf)
fathers__2 was fathers_2 (0.37 conf)
fathers__3 was fathers_3 (0.37 conf)
fathers__4 was fathers_4 (0.37 conf)
fathers__5 was fathers_5 (0.37 conf)
father__2 was father_2 (0.34 conf)
child_another_one was not required because the parent subjected the child or another child of the parent to one of the circumstances (0.37 conf)
still_recommended was still recommended because (0.37 conf)
text__4 was Text7 (0.35 conf)
text__5 was Text8 (0.35 conf)
reasonable_efforts_possible was a Reasonable efforts shall be made to preserve and reunify the family to make it possible for the children to (0.40 conf)
made_would_detrimental was b Reasonable efforts shall not be made to preserve and reunify the family because it would be detrimental to the (0.34 conf)
unknown__1 was 8 (0.38 conf)
prevent_eliminate_removal__2 was 9 Because reasonable efforts to prevent or eliminate removal or to reunite the children and family are not required (0.41 conf)
risk_harm_physical__1 was a presents a substantial risk of harm to the childrens life physical health or mental wellbeing (0.35 conf)
risk_harm_physical__2 was b does not present a substantial risk of harm to the childrens life physical health or mental wellbeing (0.40 conf)
arrangement_except_available was No provision of service or other arrangement except removal of the children is reasonably available to (0.34 conf)
conditions_custody_individual was Conditions of custody at the placement away from the home and with the individual with whom the children (0.41 conf)
unknown__2 was 11 (0.38 conf)
parenting_time__1 was 12 Parenting time with (0.39 conf)
siblings_joint_placement was a All siblings are in joint placement (0.29 conf)
b_siblings_joint_placement was b All siblings are not in joint placement because (0.34 conf)
occurring_according_law was is occurring according to law (0.40 conf)
occurring_see_item_order was is not occurring because see item 15 to order sibling contact (0.44 conf)
even_may_harmful was even if supervised may be harmful to the children (0.44 conf)
ordered was IT IS ORDERED (0.33 conf)
undefined__3 was undefined_3 (0.39 conf)
placed_department_supervision was a isare placed with the department for care and supervision and (0.27 conf)
b_isare_released was b isare released to (0.30 conf)
shall_taken_custody was The children shall be taken into protective custody To effect this order (0.40 conf)
authorized_enter_premises was is authorized to enter the premises located at (0.44 conf)
undefined__4 was undefined_4 (0.39 conf)
authorization_premises_take was This authorization to enter the premises and take the children into protective custody expires (0.41 conf)
enter_lein was Enter on LEIN (0.45 conf)
parents_guardian_legal was Names of parents guardian or legal custodian (0.41 conf)
terms_conditions_apply was The following terms and conditions apply to the parents guardian or legal custodian (0.37 conf)
children_named was 14 The children named (0.42 conf)
psychological_evaluation was a psychological evaluation (0.29 conf)
counseling was counseling (0.42 conf)
text__6 was Text9 (0.35 conf)
text__7 was Text10 (0.35 conf)
text__8 was Text11 (0.35 conf)
contact_shall_follows was 15 Sibling contact shall be as follows (0.29 conf)
unknown__3 was 16 (0.38 conf)
matter_set was 17 This matter is set for (0.43 conf)
matter_set_child_hearing was 18 This matter is set for an Indian child removal hearing on (0.39 conf)
undefined__5 was undefined_5 (0.39 conf)
is_3 was is_3 (0.35 conf)
parenting_time__2 was a Parenting time of (0.42 conf)
b_parenting_time was b Parenting time of (0.35 conf)
c_parenting_time was c Parenting time of (0.35 conf)
d was d (0.30 conf)
supervised_order_court__1 was supervised until further order of the court (0.37 conf)
unsupervised__1 was unsupervised (0.39 conf)
discretion_supervised_designee__1 was The department has discretion to allow unsupervised or supervised parenting time by its designee (0.36 conf)
is_4 was is_4 (0.35 conf)
supervised_order_court__2 was supervised until further order of the court_2 (0.35 conf)
unsupervised__2 was unsupervised_2 (0.41 conf)
discretion_supervised_designee__2 was The department has discretion to allow unsupervised or supervised parenting time by its designee_2 (0.36 conf)
is_5 was is_5 (0.35 conf)
supervised_order_court__3 was supervised until further order of the court_3 (0.35 conf)
unsupervised__3 was unsupervised_3 (0.41 conf)
discretion_supervised_designee__3 was The department has discretion to allow unsupervised or supervised parenting time by its designee_3 (0.36 conf)
adjudication_within_removal_mc was an adjudication within 63 days of removal under MCR 3972A (0.33 conf)
hearing_within_removal_mc was a dispositional hearing within 28 days of removal under MCR 3974D1 (0.36 conf)
review_hearing_within_removal was a dispositional review hearing within 14 days of removal under MCR 3974D2 (0.36 conf)
users1_name was Name (1.00 conf)
date_time__1 was Date and time (0.34 conf)
date_time__2 was Date and time_2 (0.38 conf)
text__9 was Text12 (0.35 conf)
text__10 was Text13 (0.35 conf)
text__11 was Text14 (0.35 conf)

We've done our best to group similar variables togther to avoid overwhelming the user.

Suggested Screen 0:

stat_e_n_l_county
order
of
matter
date_hearing
judge_referee
removal_hearing_held
preadjudication__1
postadjudication__1
custody_already_ordered
is
is_not
contrary_findings_made_form
parent_legal_removed
b_removal_hearing_held
preadjudication__2
postadjudication__2
necessary
necessary_b_c_reasonable_cause_believe
children_indian_mc_r
has
has_not
hearing_must_pending_conclusion
required_conducted_see_findings
qualified_expert
petition
judge
text__1
text__2
text__3
page
undefined__1
circumstances_prevent_eliminate_removal
circumstances_reasonable_prevent
finds_clear_evidence
have
have_not
unsuccessful
successful_continued
is_2
is_not_2
should
should_not
prevent_eliminate_removal__1
mother__1
father__1
subjecting_circumstances
provided_section_l_evidenced
by
undefined__2
mothers__1
mothers__2
mothers__3
mothers__4
mothers__5
mother__2
fathers__1
fathers__2
fathers__3
fathers__4
fathers__5
father__2
child_another_one
still_recommended
text__4
text__5
reasonable_efforts_possible
made_would_detrimental
unknown__1
prevent_eliminate_removal__2
risk_harm_physical__1
risk_harm_physical__2
arrangement_except_available
conditions_custody_individual
unknown__2
parenting_time__1
siblings_joint_placement
b_siblings_joint_placement
occurring_according_law
occurring_see_item_order
even_may_harmful
ordered
undefined__3
placed_department_supervision
b_isare_released
shall_taken_custody
authorized_enter_premises
undefined__4
authorization_premises_take
enter_lein
parents_guardian_legal
terms_conditions_apply
children_named
psychological_evaluation
counseling
text__6
text__7
text__8
contact_shall_follows
unknown__3
matter_set
matter_set_child_hearing
undefined__5
is_3
parenting_time__2
b_parenting_time
c_parenting_time
d
supervised_order_court__1
unsupervised__1
discretion_supervised_designee__1
is_4
supervised_order_court__2
unsupervised__2
discretion_supervised_designee__2
is_5
supervised_order_court__3
unsupervised__3
discretion_supervised_designee__3
adjudication_within_removal_mc
hearing_within_removal_mc
review_hearing_within_removal
users1_name
date_time__1
date_time__2
text__9
text__10
text__11

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

JC 75, Order After Removal Hearing (Child Protective Proceedings)

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02