The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Michigan Lists

Here is the text we could read:

In the matter of

First and last name(s), alias(es)

1. Date of trial/hearing:

Judge:

2. A petition has been filed in this matter and notice of hearing has been served as required by law.

3. The case was designated by the
adult.

prosecutor

court

for trial of the juvenile in the same manner as an

4. The juvenile appeared in court in person with parent(s), guardian, legal custodian, or guardian ad litem, and

waived representation by an attorney.

was represented by an attorney.

THE COURT FINDS:

5. The juvenile was found guilty on

Date

CONVICTED BY DISMISSED

Count

Plea* Court Jury

BY*

of the crime(s) as stated below:

CRIME

CHARGE CODE(S)
MCL citation/PACC CODE

*For plea, insert “G” for guilty plea, “NC” for nolo contendere, or “MI” for guilty but mentally ill. For dismissal, insert “D” for dismissed by court or “NP” for
dismissed by prosecutor/plaintiff.

6. The juvenile’s biometric data

has

has not

been collected in accordance with MCL 28.243.

IT IS ORDERED:

7. The juvenile is convicted of the crime(s) stated above.

8. Sentencing is set for

Date and time

Location

before Hon.

9. The juvenile shall report to the county sheriff within 24 hours for biometric data collection.

courtroom

Approved, SCAO
Form JC 70, Rev. 10/20
MCL 712A.2d, MCR 3.954, 18 USC 822(g)(9)(c)
Page 1 of 2

Distribute form to:
Court
Juvenile
Prosecutor

CTN/TCNSIDJIS Code: JOCSTATE OF MICHIGANJUDICIAL CIRCUIT - FAMILY DIVISIONCOUNTY JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION(DESIGNATED CASE)CASE NO. and JUDGEORIMI-Court addressCourt telephone no.Judgment of Conviction (Designated Case)
Page 2 of 2

(10/20)

Case No.

10. Pending sentencing, the juvenile shall

continue in custody pursuant to the prior court order.

continue to be released on bond pursuant to the prior court order.

be released or placed in custody pursuant to the attached order.

11. Other:

cooperate with and participate in services, evaluations, tests, and the sentencing investigation as requested by the

probation officer. Parent(s) shall pay the cost of professional testing and evaluations.

Judge signature and date

NOTICE OF FIREARMS RESTRICTION: Federal law and/or state law may prohibit you from possessing or purchasing
ammunition or a firearm (as those terms are defined in federal and state law) if you are convicted of a misdemeanor crime
of violence and you are a current or former spouse, parent, or guardian of the victim; you share a child in common with the
victim; you are or were cohabitating with the victim as a spouse, parent, or guardian; or you are or were involved with the
victim in another, similar relationship.

JC 70, Judgment of Conviction (Designated Case)

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from www.courts.michigan.gov/juvenile-designated-forms (2023-03)
Page(s): 2
Fields(s): 57
Average fields per page: 28
Reading Level: Grade 9
LIST Grouping(s): CO-07-00-00-00, CO-00-00-00-00, CR-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

stat_e_n_l_county was STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FAMILY DIVISION COUNTY (0.64 conf)
matter was In the matter of (0.33 conf)
ctntcn was CTNTCN (0.35 conf)
sid was SID (0.35 conf)
date_trialhearing was 1 Date of trialhearing (0.34 conf)
prosecutor was prosecutor (0.46 conf)
court was court (0.45 conf)
represented_attorney was was represented by an attorney (0.41 conf)
waived_representation_attorney was waived representation by an attorney (0.45 conf)
juvenile_found_guilty was 5 The juvenile was found guilty on (0.32 conf)
count_row__1 was CountRow1 (0.35 conf)
court_row__1 was CourtRow1 (0.45 conf)
dismisse_row__1 was DISMISSED BYRow1 (0.35 conf)
crime_row__1 was CRIMERow1 (0.41 conf)
e_code_mc_l_citation_pac_c__1 was CHARGE CODES MCL citationPACC CODERow1 (0.39 conf)
count_row__2 was CountRow2 (0.35 conf)
court_row__2 was CourtRow2 (0.45 conf)
dismisse_row__2 was DISMISSED BYRow2 (0.35 conf)
crime_row__2 was CRIMERow2 (0.41 conf)
e_code_mc_l_citation_pac_c__2 was CHARGE CODES MCL citationPACC CODERow2 (0.39 conf)
count_row__3 was CountRow3 (0.35 conf)
court_row__3 was CourtRow3 (0.45 conf)
dismisse_row__3 was DISMISSED BYRow3 (0.35 conf)
crime_row__3 was CRIMERow3 (0.41 conf)
e_code_mc_l_citation_pac_c__3 was CHARGE CODES MCL citationPACC CODERow3 (0.39 conf)
count_row__4 was CountRow4 (0.35 conf)
court_row__4 was CourtRow4 (0.45 conf)
dismisse_row__4 was DISMISSED BYRow4 (0.35 conf)
crime_row__4 was CRIMERow4 (0.41 conf)
e_code_mc_l_citation_pac_c__4 was CHARGE CODES MCL citationPACC CODERow4 (0.39 conf)
has was has (0.36 conf)
has_not was has not (0.37 conf)
sentencing_set was 8 Sentencing is set for (0.36 conf)
at was at (0.35 conf)
at_2 was at_2 (0.33 conf)
hon was before Hon (0.48 conf)
shall_report_data was 9 The juvenile shall report to the county sheriff within 24 hours for biometric data collection (0.35 conf)
text__1 was Text1 (0.35 conf)
judge__1 was Judge (0.39 conf)
text__2 was Text3 (0.35 conf)
text__3 was Text4 (0.35 conf)
text__4 was Text5 (0.35 conf)
judge__2 was Judge2 (0.35 conf)
textbox__1 was textbox101 (0.35 conf)
textbox__2 was textbox103 (0.35 conf)
textbox__3 was textbox104 (0.35 conf)
text__5 was Text7 (0.35 conf)
textbox__4 was textbox105 (0.35 conf)
textbox__5 was textbox106 (0.35 conf)
textbox__6 was textbox 107 (0.36 conf)
textbox__7 was textbox108 (0.35 conf)
custody_pursuant_prior was continue in custody pursuant to the prior court order (0.37 conf)
released_pursuant_prior_court was continue to be released on bond pursuant to the prior court order (0.39 conf)
released_custody_pursuant was be released or placed in custody pursuant to the attached order (0.37 conf)
cooperate_evaluations was cooperate with and participate in services evaluations tests and the sentencing investigation as requested by the (0.40 conf)
11_other was 11 Other (0.44 conf)
text__6 was Text8 (0.35 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

JC 70, Judgment of Conviction (Designated Case)

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02