This tool is in beta. CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE!
LIT Logo

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta
@ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

PCM 232, Order Following Hearing on Appeal of Return to Hospital/Facility from Authorized Leave

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.


About This Form:

  • Sourced from www.courts.michigan.gov/MH-Forms (2023-03)
  • Page(s): 1
  • Fields(s): 36
  • Average fields per page: 36
  • Reading Level: Grade 14
  • LIST Grouping(s): HE-03-00-00-00, HE-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.


Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

 
 
 

Here are the fields we could identify.

  • stat_e_f_n_cour_count was STATE OF MICHIGAN PROBATE COURT COUNTY OF (0.67 conf)
  • fil_e was FILE NO (0.48 conf)
  • first_middle_last_name was First middle and last name (0.37 conf)
  • date_hearing was 1 Date of hearing (0.37 conf)
  • bar was Bar no (0.41 conf)
  • undefined__1 was undefined (0.38 conf)
  • present_court was was present in court (0.36 conf)
  • present_reasons_stated was was not present for reasons stated on the record (0.37 conf)
  • with was with (0.31 conf)
  • without was without (0.45 conf)
  • attorney_individual was attorney for the individual and (0.37 conf)
  • attorney_hospitalfacility was attorney for the hospitalfacility (0.35 conf)
  • testimony_given was 5 Testimony was given by (0.42 conf)
  • undefined__2 was undefined_2 (0.39 conf)
  • filed_court_stating was 6 A clinical certificate has been filed with this court stating reasons for the return and the belief that the individual continues (0.43 conf)
  • does was does (0.45 conf)
  • does_not was does not (0.45 conf)
  • clear_evidence_requires was a There is clear and convincing evidence that the individual requires treatment at a hospital (0.43 conf)
  • adequate_basis_requires was b The director of the hospital or facility lacked an adequate basis for concluding that the individual requires further (0.37 conf)
  • individual_admission_treatment was c The individual meets the criteria for judicial admission for treatment (0.37 conf)
  • appeal_returned was 8 The appeal is dismissed and the individual is returned to the hospitalfacility (0.37 conf)
  • individual_discharged_hospital was 9 The individual is discharged from the hospital or facility (0.40 conf)
  • individual_returned_status was 10 The individual is returned to authorized leave status (0.38 conf)
  • discharged_undergo_treatment__1 was 11 The individual is discharged from the hospital and shall undergo an assisted outpatient treatment program under the (0.40 conf)
  • discharged_undergo_treatment__2 was 12 The individual is discharged from the hospital and shall undergo an assisted outpatient treatment program under the (0.40 conf)
  • individual_receive_period was 13 The individual shall receive care and treatment through an alternative to admission to a facility for a period not to (0.45 conf)
  • continuing_exceed_difference was the order of hospitalization of up to 60 days or a continuing order in any event not to exceed the difference between (0.35 conf)
  • period was for a period of (0.38 conf)
  • time_individual_leave__1 was 90 days and the combined time the individual has been hospitalized and on authorized leave status as follows (0.37 conf)
  • exceed_difference_one was the order of hospitalization of up to 90 days or a continuing order in any event not to exceed the difference between one (0.34 conf)
  • days was days under (0.40 conf)
  • time_individual_leave__2 was year and the combined time the individual has been hospitalized and on authorized leave status as follows 1 (0.37 conf)
  • time_individual_leave__3 was year and the combined time the individual has been hospitalized and on authorized leave status as follows 2 (0.37 conf)
  • signature_date was Date (1.00 conf)
  • judge was Judge (0.39 conf)
  • text was Text1 (0.35 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.