The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Michigan Lists

Here is the text we could read:

Approved, SCAO

STATE OF MICHIGAN

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
COUNTY

FRIEND OF THE COURT
ANNUAL STATUTORY REVIEW

Original - Court
1st copy - Friend of the court
2nd copy - Friend of the Court Bureau

YEAR

Court  address

Court  telephone  no.

The following review is made of the performance records of the friend of the court for this county during the past year as
required by statute.

1. Were the following purposes of the act met?

a. Did the friend of the court investigate relevant facts and make written reports and recommendations to the parties and

court regarding child custody, parenting time, and support?

Yes.
No.

Please explain how well.
Please explain why not.

b. How were domestic relations mediation services provided to the parties?  Please explain.  If services were not provided,

please explain.

c. What has been the established friend of the court procedure for initiating enforcement of support orders?  Please explain.

d. Has the friend of the court examined the records and conducted necessary investigations to determine whether child

support should be increased or decreased?  Please explain.

e. Has the friend of the court responded to complaints regarding custody and parenting time orders and initiated appropriate

enforcement proceedings?  Please explain.

(PLEASE SEE OTHER SIDE)

FOC 17   (7/12)   FRIEND OF THE COURT ANNUAL STATUTORY REVIEW

MCL 552.524

f. Has the friend of the court published informational pamphlets with all information required by statute?

g. How has the friend of the court distributed the informational pamphlets?  Please explain.

h. Has the friend of the court investigated and responded to each grievance?  Please explain.

2. Were the duties of the friend of the court carried out in a manner that reflects the needs of the community?  Please explain.

3. Was there any misconduct, neglect of statutory duty, or failure to carry out written orders of the court relative to a statutory

duty?  Please explain.

4. How was the public notice of the annual review given?

Newspaper name:

Dates published:

Other methods of public notice:

If notice was not given, please explain.

5. A written summary of public and citizen advisory committee comments received is attached.

None received.

6. Additional comments:  Additional pages may be attached as necessary.

Date

Date

I have reviewed this report.

My response is attached.

Friend of the court

Chief judge

Bar no.

Friend of the Court Annual Statutory Review

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from www.courts.michigan.gov/Domestic-Relations (2023-03)
Page(s): 2
Fields(s): 31
Average fields per page: 15
Reading Level: Grade 9
LIST Grouping(s): CO-00-00-00-00, CO-07-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

circuit was CIRCUIT (0.53 conf)
county was county (0.39 conf)
year was year (0.28 conf)
text__1 was Text115 (0.35 conf)
text__2 was Text116 (0.35 conf)
yes was yes (0.45 conf)
no was no (0.45 conf)
text__3 was Text117 (0.35 conf)
text__4 was Text118 (0.35 conf)
text__5 was Text119 (0.35 conf)
text__6 was Text121 (0.35 conf)
text__7 was Text123 (0.35 conf)
text__8 was Text122 (0.35 conf)
text__9 was Text124 (0.35 conf)
text__10 was Text125 (0.35 conf)
text__11 was Text126 (0.35 conf)
text__12 was Text127 (0.35 conf)
text__13 was Text128 (0.35 conf)
text__14 was Text129 (0.35 conf)
text__15 was Text131 (0.35 conf)
text__16 was Text130 (0.35 conf)
newspaper was newspaper (0.33 conf)
datepublished was datepublished (0.35 conf)
text__17 was Text132 (0.35 conf)
text__18 was Text133 (0.35 conf)
none_received was None received (0.43 conf)
text__19 was Text135 (0.35 conf)
signature_date__1 was Date (1.00 conf)
bar was Bar no (0.41 conf)
response_attached was My response is attached (0.44 conf)
signature_date__2 was Date_2 (1.00 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

Friend of the Court Annual Statutory Review

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02