This tool is in beta. CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE!
LIT Logo

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta
@ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

CC 295, Appeal of Suspension, Revocation, or Denial of Driver's License

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.


About This Form:

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.


Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

 
 
 

Here are the fields we could identify.

  • stat_e_f_n_l_county was STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY (0.59 conf)
  • petitioners_name_address was Petitioners name address and telephone no (0.40 conf)
  • petitioners_attorney_address was Petitioners attorney bar no address and telephone no (0.52 conf)
  • respondents_attorney_address was Respondents attorney bar no address and telephone no (0.43 conf)
  • signature_date__1 was Date (1.00 conf)
  • record_pursuant_mc_l was record pursuant to MCL 2573234 (0.46 conf)
  • license_appeal_pursuant was findings of a license appeal hearing pursuant to (0.40 conf)
  • states_state_statute was in violation of the constitution of the United States the state constitution of 1963 or a statute as described below (0.39 conf)
  • states_authority_jurisdiction was in excess of the Secretary of States statutory authority or jurisdiction as described below (0.42 conf)
  • unlawful_resulting_described was made upon unlawful procedure resulting in material prejudice to the petitioner as described below (0.47 conf)
  • competent_material_evidence was not supported by competent material and substantial evidence on the whole record as described below (0.39 conf)
  • arbitrary_unwarranted_discretion was arbitrary capricious or clearly an abuse or unwarranted exercise of discretion as described below (0.43 conf)
  • affected_substantial_described was affected by other substantial and material error of law as described below (0.41 conf)
  • signature_date__2 was Date_2 (1.00 conf)
  • text__1 was Text1 (0.35 conf)
  • judge was Judge (0.39 conf)
  • text__2 was Text3 (0.35 conf)
  • text__3 was Text4 (0.35 conf)
  • text__4 was Text5 (0.35 conf)
  • text__5 was Text6 (0.35 conf)
  • date_time was Date and time (0.34 conf)
  • location was Location (0.40 conf)
  • signature_date__3 was Date_3 (1.00 conf)
  • text__6 was Text7 (0.35 conf)
  • at was at (0.35 conf)
  • checkbox was checkbox (0.29 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.