The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Michigan Lists

Here is the text we could read:

Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s)

Defendant(s)/Respondent(s)

In the matter of

Attorney name, bar no., address, and telephone no.

Attorney for:

Attorney name, bar no., address, and telephone no.

1. The panel evaluates this case as follows:

Attached.

The award is not unanimous.

2. The panel unanimously determines that the

action

defense

is frivolous.

3. Pursuant to MCR 2.403(K)(5), the panel has

determined

there has been a breach

there has not been a breach
reasonable minds could differ as to whether there

has been a breach of the applicable standard of
care.

Attorney name, bar no., address, and telephone no.

Date

Attorney for:

Case evaluator signature

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I served a copy of this notice on the parties or their attorneys by first-class mail addressed to their last-known addresses
as defined by MCR 2.107(C)(3).

ADR clerk signature and date

STATE OF MICHIGANJUDICIAL DISTRICTJUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTYNOTICE OF CASE EVALUATION ANDACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF AWARDCASE NO. and JUDGECourt addressCourt telephone no.Approved, SCAOForm MC 32, Rev. 12/21MCR 2.403(K), (L)Page 1 of 2Distribute form to:Court (sealed)Plaintiff/AttorneyDefendant/AttorneyCase evaluators as neededNotice of Case Evaluation and Acceptance or Rejection of Award
Page 2 of 2

(12/21)

Case No.

ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION

1. Parties must file a written acceptance or rejection of the panel’s evaluation. Complete the following and file a copy of
this form with the ADR clerk within 28 days after service of this notice or the evalution will be considered rejected.

2. I

a. accept the settlement evaluation.
b. reject the settlement evaluation.
c. accept the settlement evaluation only if

all opposing parties accept.
the opposing parties accept as to the following specified coparties:

Date

Attorney/Party signature

Name (type or print)

MC 32, Notice of Case Evaluation and Acceptance or Rejection of Award

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from www.courts.michigan.gov/case-evaluation (2023-03)
Page(s): 2
Fields(s): 37
Average fields per page: 18
Reading Level: Grade 11
LIST Grouping(s): CO-00-00-00-00, CO-07-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

plaintiffs_petitioners was PlaintiffsPetitioners (0.63 conf)
defendants_respondents was DefendantsRespondents (0.38 conf)
matter was In the matter of (0.33 conf)
attorney_name_address_telephone__1 was Attorney name bar no address and telephone no (0.49 conf)
attached was Attached (0.43 conf)
award_unanimous was The award is not unanimous (0.42 conf)
panel_unanimously_determines was 2 The panel unanimously determines that the (0.37 conf)
pursuant_mc_r_k_panel was 3 Pursuant to MCR 2403K5 the panel has (0.44 conf)
action was action (0.38 conf)
defense was defense (0.40 conf)
attorney_name_address_telephone__2 was Attorney name bar no address and telephone no_2 (0.45 conf)
breach__1 was there has been a breach (0.46 conf)
breach__2 was there has not been a breach (0.41 conf)
reasonable_minds_whether was reasonable minds could differ as to whether there (0.46 conf)
signature_date__1 was Date (1.00 conf)
attorney_name_address_telephone__3 was Attorney name bar no address and telephone no_3 (0.45 conf)
district was District (0.24 conf)
circuit was Circuit (0.33 conf)
county was County (0.39 conf)
judge was Judge (0.39 conf)
court_telephone was Court telephone no (0.51 conf)
court_address was Court address (0.42 conf)
attorney__1 was attorney1 (0.35 conf)
attorney__2 was attorney2 (0.35 conf)
attorney__3 was attorney3 (0.35 conf)
text__1 was Text10 (0.35 conf)
text__2 was Text11 (0.35 conf)
text__3 was Text12 (0.35 conf)
text__4 was Text13 (0.35 conf)
accept_settlement_evaluation__1 was a accept the settlement evaluation (0.36 conf)
reject_settlement_evaluation was b reject the settlement evaluation (0.34 conf)
accept_settlement_evaluation__2 was c accept the settlement evaluation only if (0.32 conf)
opposing_parties_accept was all opposing parties accept (0.35 conf)
opposing_accept_following was the opposing parties accept as to the following specified coparties (0.31 conf)
signature_date__2 was Date_2 (1.00 conf)
name_type_print was Name type or print (0.45 conf)
text__5 was Text14 (0.35 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

MC 32, Notice of Case Evaluation and Acceptance or Rejection of Award

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02