This tool is in beta. CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE!
LIT Logo

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta
@ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

JC 106, Findings Following Putative Father Hearing

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.


About This Form:

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.


Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

 
 
 

Here are the fields we could identify.

  • stat_e_n_l_county was STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FAMILY DIVISION COUNTY (0.64 conf)
  • first_last_name_minor was First and last name of minor (0.32 conf)
  • date_hearing was 1 Date of hearing (0.37 conf)
  • users1_name was Name (1.00 conf)
  • unknown was 2 (0.38 conf)
  • hearing_conducted_matter_pursuant was 3 A hearing was conducted in this matter pursuant to MCR 3921D (0.34 conf)
  • manner_reasonably_provide was 4 The putative father was served in a manner that was reasonably calculated to provide notice to the putative father (0.40 conf)
  • preponderance_evidence_minor was 5 A preponderance of the evidence establishes that the putative father is the natural father of the minor and pursuant (0.40 conf)
  • cause_another_identifiable was 6 There is probable cause to believe that another identifiable person is the natural father of the minor and the court shall (0.45 conf)
  • cannot_may_without was 7 After diligent inquiry the identity of the natural father cannot be determined and the court may proceed without further (0.39 conf)
  • proper_given_failed was 8 After proper notice was given the putative father failed to appear at the hearing (0.42 conf)
  • appeared_hearing_failed was 9 The putative father appeared at the hearing but failed to establish paternity within the time set by the court (0.43 conf)
  • good_cause_court_extends_time was Good cause has been shown and the court extends this time to (0.36 conf)
  • days was days (0.38 conf)
  • putative_father__1 was The putative father (0.36 conf)
  • waives_rights_notice__1 was a waives all rights to further notice (0.47 conf)
  • waives_right_termination_rights__1 was b waives the right to notice of termination of parental rights (0.42 conf)
  • c_waives_right_attorney__1 was c waives the right to an attorney (0.49 conf)
  • putative_father__2 was The putative father_2 (0.43 conf)
  • waives_rights_notice__2 was a waives all rights to further notice_2 (0.44 conf)
  • waives_right_termination_rights__2 was b waives the right to notice of termination of parental rights_2 (0.45 conf)
  • c_waives_right_attorney__2 was c waives the right to an attorney_2 (0.47 conf)
  • text__1 was Text1 (0.35 conf)
  • cas_e was CASE NO (0.47 conf)
  • petition was Petition no (0.49 conf)
  • judge was Judge (0.39 conf)
  • text__2 was Text4 (0.35 conf)
  • text__3 was Text5 (0.35 conf)
  • text__4 was Text6 (0.35 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.