The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: Michigan Lists

Here is the text we could read:

Plaintiff’s name and address

Defendant’s name and address

1. Date of hearing:

Referee:

Name of payer:

Date of support order:

Bar no.

FINDINGS:

with an order requiring him/her to obtain or
maintain health care coverage.

a. Payer was served with the support order.
b.

Defendant

Plaintiff

was served

3. Payer

was
personally.

was not

served with
by mail.

an order to show cause/adjournment notice

a bench warrant

4. Payer

did not appear.

did appear.

Attorney name Bar no.

was present.

5. Payee

did not appear.

did appear.

Attorney name Bar no.

was present.

6. The payer was ordered to pay:

Type of Payment

Current Amount

Overdue Amount

Frequency
of Payment

a. Child Support

b. Spousal Support

c. Fixed Obligation

d. Pregnancy and/or
Birth Expenses

e. Service Fees

f. Other

The overdue amounts were

computed through

Date

and are subject to an audit. The last

payment was made on

Total

STATE OF MICHIGANJUDICIAL CIRCUITCOUNTY REFEREE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION FOR ORDER AFTER HEARING ON BENCH WARRANT/SHOW CAUSE (SUPPORT)CASE NO. and JUDGECourt addressCourt telephone no.Approved, SCAOForm FOC 56, Rev. 3/21MCL 552.507, MCR 3.215Page 1 of 2Distribute form to: Court Payer Payee Friend of the courtReferee Findings and Rec. for Order After Hrg. on Bench Warrant/Show Cause (Support)
Page 2 of 2

(3/21)

Case No.

a. Payer has income of $
b. Payer has no current income.
c. Payer has no present ability to pay support.

8. Payer has other sources of income or currently available resources as follows:

9. Payer has the capacity to pay out of currently available resources $

of the amount due.

10. By the exercise of due diligence, the payer could have the capacity to pay all or some portion of the amount due.
(Specify.)

11. Payer has failed to satisfy the conditions of the commitment order.

12.

Plaintiff

Defendant

failed to pay the ordered share of unreimbursed health-care expenses.

Plaintiff

13.
does not
reasonable cost, as a benefit of employment, or as an optional coverage for dependents on a policy already
obtained by the health insurance provider.

have health care coverage available to him/her at a

Defendant

does

15. Referral to work activity

is required.

is not required for good cause as stated on the record.

performance bond was posted.

14. $

16. Other:

17. Remarks:

18. Either party has the right to request a de novo hearing as defined in MCR 3.215 by filing a written objection and

notice of hearing with the clerk of the court within 21 days after this recommendation is served. The party requesting
a de novo hearing must serve the objection and notice of hearing on the other party.

On the basis of these findings, the referee recommends entry of the attached order (form FOC 6).

Referee signature and date

FOC 56, Referee Findings and Recommendation for Order After Hearing on Bench Warrant/Show Cause (Support)

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the Michigan state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from www.courts.michigan.gov/Domestic-Relations (2023-03)
Page(s): 2
Fields(s): 84
Average fields per page: 42
Reading Level: Grade 9
LIST Grouping(s): MO-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

stat_e_f_n_l_county was STATE OF MICHIGAN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY (0.59 conf)
plaintiffs_name_address was Plaintiffs name and address (0.47 conf)
date_hearing was 1 Date of hearing (0.37 conf)
bar__1 was Bar no (0.41 conf)
name_payer was Name of payer (0.44 conf)
date_support_order was Date of support order (0.44 conf)
defendants_name_address was Defendants name and address (0.31 conf)
payer_served_support_order was a Payer was served with the support order (0.31 conf)
b was b (0.34 conf)
plaintiff__1 was Plaintiff (1.00 conf)
defendant__1 was Defendant (1.00 conf)
was was was (0.41 conf)
appear__1 was did not appear (0.43 conf)
appear__2 was did not appear_2 (0.39 conf)
was_not was was not (0.42 conf)
order_show_notice was an order to show causeadjournment notice (0.53 conf)
bench_warrant was a bench warrant (0.42 conf)
attorney_name__1 was Attorney name (0.45 conf)
bar__2 was Bar no_2 (0.37 conf)
attorney_name__2 was Attorney name_2 (0.45 conf)
bar__3 was Bar no_3 (0.37 conf)
payer_ordered_pay was 6 The payer was ordered to pay (0.49 conf)
current_amount_support__1 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymenta Child Support (0.40 conf)
current_amount_support__2 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymenta Child Support_2 (0.39 conf)
overdue_amount_row__1 was Overdue AmountRow1 (0.36 conf)
signature_date__1 was Date (1.00 conf)
current_amount_support__3 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymentb Spousal Support (0.40 conf)
current_amount_support__4 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymentb Spousal Support_2 (0.43 conf)
overdue_amount_row__2 was Overdue AmountRow2 (0.36 conf)
current_amount_fixed__1 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymentc Fixed Obligation (0.38 conf)
current_amount_fixed__2 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymentc Fixed Obligation_2 (0.40 conf)
overdue_amount_row__3 was Overdue AmountRow3 (0.36 conf)
amount_pregnancy_birth__1 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymentd Pregnancy andor Birth Expenses (0.38 conf)
amount_pregnancy_birth__2 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymentd Pregnancy andor Birth Expenses_2 (0.40 conf)
overdue_amount_row__4 was Overdue AmountRow4 (0.36 conf)
signature_date__2 was Date_2 (1.00 conf)
current_amount_fees__1 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymente Service Fees (0.38 conf)
current_amount_fees__2 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymente Service Fees_2 (0.32 conf)
overdue_amount_row__5 was Overdue AmountRow5 (0.36 conf)
current_amount_frequency__1 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymentf Other (0.38 conf)
current_amount_frequency__2 was Current Amount Frequency of Paymentf Other_2 (0.40 conf)
overdue_amount_row__6 was Overdue AmountRow6 (0.36 conf)
overdue_amount_row__7 was Overdue AmountRow7 (0.36 conf)
text__1 was Text1 (0.35 conf)
judge was Judge (0.39 conf)
text__2 was Text3 (0.35 conf)
text__3 was Text4 (0.35 conf)
text__4 was Text5 (0.35 conf)
personally was personally (0.35 conf)
checkbox__1 was checkbox2 (0.35 conf)
checkbox__2 was checkbox1 (0.35 conf)
checkbox__3 was checkbox4 (0.35 conf)
checkbox__4 was checkbox3 (0.35 conf)
checkbox__5 was checkbox5 (0.35 conf)
undefined__1 was undefined_3 (0.39 conf)
unknown__1 was 7 (0.38 conf)
income_available_resources was 8 Payer has other sources of income or currently available resources as follows (0.47 conf)
pay_available_resources was 9 Payer has the capacity to pay out of currently available resources (0.35 conf)
due_pay_portion_amount was 10 By the exercise of due diligence the payer could have the capacity to pay all or some portion of the amount due (0.31 conf)
failed_satisfy_commitment was 11 Payer has failed to satisfy the conditions of the commitment order (0.38 conf)
unknown__2 was 12 (0.38 conf)
unknown__3 was 13 (0.38 conf)
unknown__4 was 14 (0.38 conf)
referral_work_activity was 15 Referral to work activity (0.47 conf)
16_other was 16 Other (0.44 conf)
remarks was 17 Remarks (0.43 conf)
payer_income was a Payer has income of (0.48 conf)
b_payer_current_income was b Payer has no current income (0.39 conf)
payer_present_ability_pay_support was c Payer has no present ability to pay support (0.45 conf)
undefined__2 was undefined_4 (0.39 conf)
amount_due was of the amount due (0.38 conf)
plaintiff__2 was Plaintiff_2 (0.54 conf)
defendant__2 was Defendant_2 (0.46 conf)
plaintiff__3 was Plaintiff_3 (0.54 conf)
defendant__3 was Defendant_3 (0.46 conf)
does was does (0.45 conf)
does_not was does not (0.45 conf)
performance_bond_posted was performance bond was posted (0.41 conf)
required was is required (0.39 conf)
required_good_cause_stated was is not required for good cause as stated on the record (0.44 conf)
text__5 was Text6 (0.35 conf)
text__6 was Text7 (0.35 conf)
text__7 was Text8 (0.35 conf)
text__8 was Text9 (0.35 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

FOC 56, Referee Findings and Recommendation for Order After Hearing on Bench Warrant/Show Cause (Support)

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02