The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: California Lists

Here is the text we could read:

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:

STATE BAR NUMBER:

FOR COURT USE ONLY

JV-598

STATE:

FAX NO.:

ZIP CODE:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
STREET ADDRESS:

NAME:

FIRM NAME:

STREET ADDRESS:

CITY:

TELEPHONE NO.:

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

ATTORNEY FOR (name):

MAILING ADDRESS:

CITY AND ZIP CODE:

BRANCH NAME:

CHILD'S NAME:

PETITION TO REVIEW DENIAL OF SEALING OF RECORDS
AFTER DIVERSION PROGRAM

CASE NUMBER:

Date:

Time:

Department:

• Use this form if you received a notice from a probation officer saying that you did not satisfactorily complete your diversion program
and you want the court to review this determination so that your records can be sealed. You must give this form to probation with in
60 days of receiving the notice of unsatisfactory completion if you want a court review.

INSTRUCTIONS

• How to fill out the form:

A. Put your name and contact information in the box at the top of the form and in item 1 below.
B. Put the address of the juvenile court in the county where you were on probation for the offense.
C. In item 2, put the reasons why you think that you did satisfactorily complete your diversion program.

D. Check the box in item 5 if you need an interpreter, and specify the language.
E. Attach the notice from probation telling you that you did not satisfactorily complete your diversion program.
F. Give the completed form to probation to file with the court.

For information about record sealing, go to www.courts.ca.gov/28120.htm.

MY INFORMATION
My name is:
I was born on (date):

WHY COMPLETION OF DIVERSION SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE COURT TO BE SATISFACTORY
For the reasons stated below, I believe that I satisfactorily complied with the reasonable terms of program participation that were
within my capacity to perform.

Form Approved for Optional Use
Judicial Council of California
JV-598 [New September 1, 2018]

PETITION TO REVIEW DENIAL OF SEALING OF RECORDS
AFTER DIVERSION PROGRAM

Page 1 of 2

Welfare and Institutions Code, § 786.5
www.courts.ca.gov

CHILD'S NAME:

CASE NUMBER:

JV-598

ATTACHMENT OF PROBATION NOTICE
I have attached a copy of the notice from the probation department determining that I did not complete my program satisfactorily
(form JV-597 or similar local form) to this form.

4. REQUEST FOR INTERPRETER

If there is a hearing, I will need a

(language)

interpreter.

Date:

INSTRUCTIONS—AFTER YOU COMPLETE THIS FORM

SIGNATURE of PETITIONER

Give this form and the attached copy of the notice from probation to the probation officer or department that gave you
the notice. The probation department will file it with the court within 30 days and tell you when and where to come to
court for your hearing. If you do not have an attorney, the court will appoint one for you before or at the hearing.

JV-598 [New September 1, 2018]

PETITION TO REVIEW DENIAL OF SEALING OF RECORDS
AFTER DIVERSION PROGRAM

Page 2 of 2

Petition to Review Denial of Sealing of Records After Diversion Program

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the California state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from selfhelp.courts.ca.gov (2023-03)
Page(s): 2
Fields(s): 29
Average fields per page: 14
Reading Level: Grade 7
LIST Grouping(s): CO-07-00-00-00, CO-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

page_std_p_header_county was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].CourtInfo[0].CrtCounty_ft[0] (0.62 conf)
page_std_p_header_info__1 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].CourtInfo[0].Branch_ft[0] (0.42 conf)
page_std_p_header_info_city__1 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].CourtInfo[0].CityZip_ft[0] (0.42 conf)
page_std_p_header_info__2 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].CourtInfo[0].Street_ft[0] (0.42 conf)
page_std_p_header_info__3 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].CourtInfo[0].MailingAdd_ft[0] (0.42 conf)
topmost_subform_page_std_p_header_sf_title_party_name_ft was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].TitlePartyName[0].Party1_ft[0] (0.42 conf)
page_std_p_header_number__1 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].CaseNumber[0].CaseNumber_ft[0] (0.39 conf)
page_std_p_header_sf_info__1 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].AttyState_ft[0] (0.43 conf)
page_std_p_header_info_zip was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].AttyZip_ft[0] (0.39 conf)
page_std_p_header_info_city__2 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].AttyCity_ft[0] (0.44 conf)
page_std_p_header_info__4 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].AttyStreet_ft[0] (0.45 conf)
page_std_p_header_sf_info__2 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].AttyFirm_ft[0] (0.42 conf)
page_std_p_header_info_name was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].AttyName_ft[0] (0.42 conf)
page_std_p_header_info_phone was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].Phone_ft[0] (0.41 conf)
page_std_p_header_sf_info__3 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].Fax_ft[0] (0.41 conf)
page_std_p_header_info_email was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].Email_ft[0] (0.41 conf)
page_std_p_header_sf_info__4 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].AttyFor_ft[0] (0.43 conf)
page_std_p_header_sf_info__5 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].AttyInfo[0].BarNo_ft[0] (0.43 conf)
page_std_p_header_number__2 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].CaseNumber[1].dept_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
page_std_p_number_date was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].CaseNumber[1].date_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
std_p_header_number_time was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].StdP1Header_sf[0].CaseNumber[1].time_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
topmost_subform_page_fill_text__1 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].FillText106[0] (0.44 conf)
topmost_subform_page_fill_text__2 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].FillText106[1] (0.44 conf)
topmost_page_text_field was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].TextField6[0] (0.36 conf)
topmost_subform_page_r_b_choices was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].RB2Choices[0] (0.33 conf)
topmost_subform_page_fill_text__3 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].FillText1140[0] (0.44 conf)
topmost_subform_page_px_caption_sf_case_number_ft was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].PxCaption_sf[0].CaseNumber[0].CaseNumber_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
topmost_subform_page_px_caption_sf_title_party_name_ft was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].PxCaption_sf[0].TitlePartyName[0].Party1_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
topmost_subform_page was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].T14[0] (0.38 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

Launch Form in Weaver

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

Petition to Review Denial of Sealing of Records After Diversion Program

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02