The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

LIT Lab Home | About The Explorer | Find & Compare | Explore: California Lists

Here is the text we could read:

Plaintiff/Petitioner: 

Defendant/Respondent:

CASE NUMBER:

EJT-022A

             [PROPOSED] CONSENT ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY EXPEDITED JURY TRIAL  
             AGREEMENT OF PARTIES (MANDATORY EXPEDITED JURY TRIAL PROCEDURES) 

(This attachment may be used with form EJT-018 OR EJT-020)

 ATTACHMENT TO 

The parties have agreed to the following (check all items on which agreements have been reached and describe the agreements in 
detail. If more space is needed for any item, use form MC-025 and complete item 15 below):

(For voluntary expedited jury trial cases only) Modifications of the timeline for, or other aspects of, the pretrial submissions 
required by rule 3.1548 of the California Rules of Court (describe timeline or other changes): 

Limitations on the number of witnesses per party, including expert witnesses 

(describe):

Modifications of statutory or rule provisions regarding exchange of expert witness information and presentation of testimony 
by such witnesses

(describe):

Allocation of time periods stated in rule 3.1550 of the California Rules of Court, including how arguments and  
cross-examination may be used by each party in the five-hour time frame (describe):

Agreement as to any evidentiary matters, including any stipulations or admissions regarding factual matters (state such  
matters in detail):

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Agreement about what constitutes necessary or relevant evidence for a particular factual determination  (describe):

Form Approved for Optional Use 
Judicial Council of California 
EJT-022A [Rev. July  1, 2016]

ATTACHMENT TO 
[PROPOSED] CONSENT ORDER or  
AGREEMENT OF PARTIES

Page 1 of 2

Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 630.01–630.29; 
 Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.1545–3.1553  

www.courts.ca.gov

Plaintiff/Petitioner: 

Defendant/Respondent:

CASE NUMBER:

EJT-022A

7.

Agreement about admissibility of particular exhibits or demonstrative evidence presented without the legally required  
authentication or foundation (describe):

8.

Agreement about admissibility of video or written depositions and declarations (describe):

9.

Agreement about any other evidentiary issues or the application of any of the rules of evidence  (describe):

10.

Agreement to use photographs, diagrams, slides, electronic presentations, overhead projections, notebooks of exhibits, or  
other methods for presenting information to the jury  (describe):

11.

Agreement concerning the time frame for filing and serving motions in limine 

(describe):

12.

Agreement that fewer than eight jurors may hear this case 

(describe):

13.

Agreement concerning the number of jurors required to reach a verdict in this case  
regarding loss of juror after trial starts):

(describe, including any agreement  

14.

Other agreements 

(describe):

15.

Form MC-025 is attached, with further details concerning items 

(list items):

EJT-022A [Rev. July 1, 2016]

Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT TO 
[PROPOSED] CONSENT ORDER or  
AGREEMENT OF PARTIES

Attachment to [Proposed] Consent Order Or Agreement of Parties

This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the California state courts. To learn more about the project, check out our about page.

Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03) and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.

About This Form:

Sourced from selfhelp.courts.ca.gov (2023-03)
Page(s): 2
Fields(s): 38
Average fields per page: 19
Reading Level: Grade 10
LIST Grouping(s): CO-07-00-00-00, CO-00-00-00-00.

Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more. Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used, passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.

Identified Data Fields:

We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions. When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name. If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.

Here are the fields we could identify.

page_timeline_modifications was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0]._01\.timeline\.modifications[0] (0.60 conf)
page_witness_limitations was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0]._02\.witness\.limitations[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_page_modifications was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0]._03\.modifications[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__1 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CB\.02[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__2 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CB\.03[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__3 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CB\.04[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__4 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CB\.05[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__5 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CB\.06[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__6 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CB\.15[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__7 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CB\.15[1] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__8 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CB\.03[1] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_time was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0]._04\.time[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_matters was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0]._05\.matters[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_page_evidence__1 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0]._06\.evidence[0] (0.38 conf)
page_area_title_party_name__1 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CaptionPx_sf[0].#area[0].TitlePartyName[0].Party1_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
page_area_title_party_name__2 was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CaptionPx_sf[0].#area[0].TitlePartyName[0].Party2_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
topmost_subform_page_caption_px_sf_area_case_number_ft was topmostSubform[0].Page1[0].CaptionPx_sf[0].#area[0].CaseNumber[0].CaseNumber_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
topmost_page_filing_time was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0]._11\.filing\.time[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_page_mc_attached was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0]._15\.mc-025\.attached[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0]._14\.other[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_page_fewer_jurors was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0]._12\.fewer\.jurors[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_page_number_jurors was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0]._13\.number\.of\.jurors[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__9 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CB\.07[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__10 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CB\.08[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__11 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CB\.09[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__12 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CB\.10[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__13 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CB\.11[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__14 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CB\.12[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__15 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CB\.13[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__16 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CB\.14[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_c_b__17 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CB\.15[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_page_exhibits was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0]._07\.exhibits[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_depositions was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0]._08\.depositions[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_page_evidence__2 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0]._09\.other\.evidence[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_page_presentation was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0]._10\.presentation[0] (0.38 conf)
topmost_subform_page_caption_px_sf_title_party_name_ft__1 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CaptionPx_sf[0].TitlePartyName[0].Party1_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
topmost_subform_page_caption_px_sf_title_party_name_ft__2 was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CaptionPx_sf[0].TitlePartyName[0].Party2_ft[0] (0.40 conf)
topmost_subform_page_caption_px_sf_case_number_ft was topmostSubform[0].Page2[0].CaptionPx_sf[0].CaseNumber[0].CaseNumber_ft[0] (0.40 conf)

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver. To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.

Launch Form in Weaver

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02

Attachment to [Proposed] Consent Order Or Agreement of Parties

About This Form:

Identified Data Fields:

Create an Interactive Version of this Form:

The Legal Innovation & Technology Lab's Form Explorer ^Beta @ Suffolk Law School Last updated 2023-04-02