Here is the text we could read:
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
JV-133
TELEPHONE NO.:
FAX NO. (Optional):
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR (Name):
STREET ADDRESS:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE:
BRANCH NAME:
CHILD(REN)'S NAME(S):
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ABILITY TO REPAY
COST OF LEGAL SERVICES
CASE NUMBER:
On (date): , (name): , a person responsible for the support of the children
named above, was ordered to report for an evaluation to determine his or her ability to reimburse the court's cost of legal services
provided directly to him or her or to the children named above in this case.
The responsible person:
has been reunified with the children under a court order. Repayment would harm his or her ability to support the children. I
do not, therefore, petition the court for an order of repayment.
did not appear as ordered or respond to the order. As required by law, I recommend and petition that the court
order that person to repay the full cost of legal services, in the amount of $
did appear as ordered. Based on an interview concerning his or her financial condition and an analysis of his or her
financial declaration and supporting documentation, I find that the responsible person (check all that apply):
a.
b.
c.
is unable to repay the costs of the legal services in this case.
is able to repay the cost of legal services provided directly to him or her in the amount of $ .
is able to repay the cost of legal services provided to the child(ren) named above in the amount of
$ and
(1)
(2)
has agreed to repayment on the terms set forth on the accompanying Response to
Recommendation Regarding Ability to Repay Cost of Legal Services. I petition the court to
order repayment on these terms.
disputes this assessment of his or her ability to repay the assessed costs and has
requested a hearing.
A hearing is scheduled:
Date:
Time:
Dept./Room:
at Court address above other (specify address):
The responsible person is ordered to appear at the above time and place without further notice.
1.
2.
3.
Date:
(NAME OF FINANCIAL EVALUATION OFFICER)
(SIGNATURE OF FINANCIAL EVALUATION OFFICER)
Form Approved for Alternative Optional Use
Instead of Form JV-136
Judicial Council of California
JV-133 [New January 1, 2013]
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ABILITY TO REPAY
COST OF LEGAL SERVICES
Welfare and Institutions Code, §§ 903.1,
903.45(b), 903.47
www.courts.ca.gov
Page 1 of 1
Recommendation Regarding Ability to Repay Cost of Legal Services
This info page is part of the LIT Lab's Form Explorer project. It is not associated with the California state courts.
To learn more about the project, check out our about page.
Downloads: You can download both the original form (last checked 2023-03)
and the machine-processed form with normalized data fields.
About This Form:
- Sourced from selfhelp.courts.ca.gov (2023-03)
- Page(s): 1
- Fields(s): 37
- Average fields per page: 37
- Reading Level: Grade 9
- LIST Grouping(s):
Unknown
Use our Rate My PDF tool to learn more.
Go beyond the above insights and learn more about this or any pdf form at
RateMyPDF.com, includes: counts of difficult words used,
passive voice decetion, and suggestions for how to make the form more usable.
Identified Data Fields:
We have done our best to automaticly identify and name form fields according to our naming conventions.
When possible, we've used names tied to our question library. See e.g., user1_name.
If we think we've found a match to a question in our library, it is highlighted in green. Novel names are auto generated. So, you will probably need to edit some of them if you're trying to stick to the convention.
Here are the fields we could identify.
atty__1
was Atty1 (0.97 conf)atty__2
was Atty2 (0.35 conf)atty__3
was Atty3 (0.35 conf)atty__4
was Atty4 (0.35 conf)tel
was Tel (0.36 conf)fax
was Fax (0.28 conf)email
was email (0.38 conf)attorney
was Attorney.for (0.35 conf)court_county
was Court.County (0.43 conf)court_street
was Court.street (0.35 conf)court_mailing
was Court.mailing (0.35 conf)court_city_zip
was Court.City.zip (0.49 conf)court_branch
was Court.branch (0.35 conf)childrens_names
was ChildrensNames (0.37 conf)docket_number
was CaseNumber (1.00 conf)f_name
was TF0Name (0.45 conf)c_b__1
was CB2 (0.40 conf)c_b__2
was CB1 (0.40 conf)c_b__3
was CB3 (0.40 conf)c_b__4
was CB3b (0.34 conf)c_b__5
was CB3a (0.34 conf)f_date
was TF0Date (0.39 conf)f_amount
was TF2Amount (0.40 conf)f_b_amount
was TF3bAmount (0.43 conf)c_b__6
was CB3c (0.34 conf)c_b__7
was CB3c2 (0.34 conf)c_b_hearing
was CB3c2Hearing (0.33 conf)c_b__8
was CB3c1 (0.34 conf)c_b_address__1
was CB3c2AddressAbove (0.34 conf)c_b_address__2
was CB3c2OtherAddress (0.32 conf)f_c_amount
was TF3cAmount (0.43 conf)f_c_time
was TF3c2Time (0.35 conf)f_c_dept
was TF3c2Dept (0.44 conf)f_c_address
was TF3c2Address (0.34 conf)f_c_date
was TF3c2Date (0.41 conf)feo_name
was FEOName (0.39 conf)signature_date
was Date (1.00 conf)
We've done our best to group similar variables togther to avoid overwhelming the user.
Suggested Screen 0:
atty__1
atty__2
atty__3
atty__4
court_city_zip
Suggested Screen 1:
Suggested Screen 2:
Suggested Screen 3:
Suggested Screen 4:
attorney
court_county
court_street
court_mailing
court_branch
Suggested Screen 5:
Suggested Screen 6:
docket_number
f_name
c_b__1
c_b__2
c_b__3
c_b__4
c_b__5
f_date
f_amount
f_b_amount
c_b__6
c_b__7
c_b_hearing
c_b__8
c_b_address__1
c_b_address__2
f_c_amount
f_c_time
f_c_dept
f_c_address
f_c_date
signature_date
Suggested Screen 7:
Create an Interactive Version of this Form:
The Weaver creates a draft guided interview from a template form, like the one provided here. You can use the link below to open this form in the Weaver.
To learn more, read "Weaving" your form into a draft interview.
Launch Form in Weaver